【24h】

The Analytic Lenses of Ethnography:

机译:人种学分析镜头:

获取原文
       

摘要

It is almost axiomatic that there are two contrasting theoretical approaches to ethnography: induction and deduction. However, regardless of whether ethnographers build theory from observations (induction) or use observations to test theory (deduction), they approach the field armed with one or more particular analytic lens that leads them to focus on a distinct thread of the social fabric. We outline the suite of analytic lenses that typify ethnography and identify eight ideal types. Though not mutually exclusive, they can be usefully grouped and contrasted accordingly: (1) the level of explanation: micro, organizational, and macro; (2) the subject of explanation: people and places and mechanisms; (3) the location of explanation: dispositions and situations; and (4) reflexivity. We specify the basic modes of analysis that typify each ideal type, trace their implications for how one selects units of observation, and demonstrate how these different ethnographic styles illuminate different dimensions of the social world.
机译:人种志学有两种截然不同的理论方法:归纳法和演绎法,这几乎是不言而喻的。但是,无论民族志学家是从观察中建立理论(归纳)还是使用观察来检验理论(推论),他们都以一个或多个特定的分析视角武装着这一领域,从而使他们专注于社会结构的独特脉络。我们概述了代表人种志的分析镜头套件,并确定了八种理想的类型。尽管不是互斥的,但可以对它们进行有效地分组和对比:(1)解释级别:微观,组织和宏观; (2)解释的主题:人,地方和机制; (3)说明的地点:性格和情况; (4)自反性。我们指定了代表每种理想类型的基本分析模式,跟踪它们对选择观察单位的方式的影响,并说明这些不同的人种学风格如何照亮社会世界的不同维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号