首页> 外文期刊>Soil and Water Research >Evaluation of different soil water potential by field capacity threshold in combination with a triggered irrigation module
【24h】

Evaluation of different soil water potential by field capacity threshold in combination with a triggered irrigation module

机译:通过田间持水量阈值结合触发灌溉模块评估不同土壤水势

获取原文
           

摘要

Irrigation efficiency improvement requires optimization of its parameters like irrigation scheduling, threshold and amount of water usage. If these parameters are not satisfactorily optimized, negative consequences for the plant-soil system can occur with decreased yield and hence economic viability of the agricultural production. Numerical modelling represents an efficient, i.e. simple and fast method for optimizing and testing different irrigation scenarios. In this study HYDRUS-1D model assuming single- and dual-porosity systems was used to evaluate a triggered irrigation module for irrigation scheduling in maize/soybean cropping trials. Irrigation treatment consisted of two irrigation regimes (A2 = 60–100% field capacity (FC) and A3 = 80–100% FC) and control plot (A1) without irrigation. The model showed a very good fit to the measured data with satisfactory model efficiency values of 0.77, 0.69, and 0.93 (single-porosity model) and 0.84, 0.67, and 0.92 (dual-porosity model) for A1, A2, and A3 plots, respectively. The single-porosity model gave a slightly better fit in the irrigated plots while the dual-porosity model gave better performance in the control plot. This inconsistency between the two approaches is due to the manual irrigation triggering and uncertainty in field data timing collection. Using the triggered irrigation module provided more irrigation events during maize and soybean crop rotation and consequently increased cumulative amounts of irrigated water. However, that increase resulted in more water available in the root zone during high evapotranspiration period. The HYDRUS code can be used to optimize irrigation threshold values further by assuming different scenarios (e.g. different irrigation threshold or scheduling) or a different crop.
机译:提高灌溉效率需要优化其参数,如灌溉计划,阈值和用水量。如果未令人满意地优化这些参数,则对植物-土壤系统的负面影响可能会降低产量,进而降低农业生产的经济可行性。数值建模代表了一种有效的方法,即简单,快速的方法,可以优化和测试不同的灌溉方案。在这项研究中,假设单孔和双孔系统的HYDRUS-1D模型用于评估触发灌溉模块,以进行玉米/大豆种植试验中的灌溉计划。灌溉处理包括两种灌溉制度(A2 = 60–100%田间持水量(FC)和A3 = 80–100%FC)和不灌溉的对照地块(A1)。该模型显示出非常适合测量的数据,对于A1,A2和A3图,令人满意的模型效率值分别为0.77、0.69和0.93(单孔隙率模型)以及0.84、0.67和0.92(双孔隙率模型)。 , 分别。单孔隙度模型在灌溉地块中拟合效果更好,而双孔隙度模型在控制地块中拟合效果更好。两种方法之间的这种不一致是由于人工灌溉触发和田间数据定时采集的不确定性所致。使用触发灌溉模块在玉米和大豆作物轮作期间提供了更多的灌溉事件,因此增加了灌溉水的累积量。但是,这种增加导致在高蒸散期的根区有更多的水可用。通过假设不同的情况(例如不同的灌溉阈值或时间表)或不同的作物,HYDRUS代码可用于进一步优化灌溉阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号