...
首页> 外文期刊>Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. Revista >A comparative study of the parasitological techniques: Kato-Katz and coprotest?
【24h】

A comparative study of the parasitological techniques: Kato-Katz and coprotest?

机译:寄生虫学技术的比较研究:加藤-卡茨和共同抗议?

获取原文

摘要

Parasitological diagnosis should be appropriately conducted with high sensitivity and specificity so that intestinal parasite can be detected as the specific treatment depends on this result. A comparative study was developed to evaluate the concordance between the Kato-Katz and coprotest® methods in the detection of helminthes in 332 individuals in Pedro de Toledo. A significant difference was found in the case of the Trichuris trichiura - 16.2% with the Kato-Katz method and 7.5% with the coprotest® method. Therefore, the positive and negative samples of the coprotest® method were compared with the number of eggs per gram of feces (epg) obtained by the Kato-Katz method. When the coprotest® method was negative, 65 epg of Trichuris trichiura were found by the Kato-Katz method and when the coprotest® was positive the epg according to the Kato-Katz were far higher, 199 epg, which demonstrated that the coprotest® was inferior to the Kato-Katz method regarding low intensity infections.
机译:寄生虫学诊断应适当地以高灵敏度和特异性进行,以便可以检测到肠道寄生虫,因为具体治疗取决于此结果。进行了一项比较研究,以评估Kato-Katz方法与coprotest®方法在Pedro de Toledo的332个人中检测蠕虫的一致性。在Trichuris trichiura的情况下发现了显着差异:Kato-Katz方法为16.2%,coprotest®方法为7.5%。因此,将coprotest®方法的阳性和阴性样品与通过Kato-Katz方法获得的每克粪便(epg)的卵数进行了比较。当coprotest®方法为阴性时,通过加藤-卡茨方法测得65 epg的Trichuris trichiura;当coprotest®为阳性时,根据加藤-卡茨方法测得的epg更高,为199 epg,表明coprotest®在低强度感染方面不如Kato-Katz方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号