首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >How journalists verify user-generated content during terrorist crises. Analyzing Twitter communication during the Brussels attacks:
【24h】

How journalists verify user-generated content during terrorist crises. Analyzing Twitter communication during the Brussels attacks:

机译:在恐怖主义危机期间,记者如何验证用户生成的内容。分析布鲁塞尔袭击期间的Twitter通信:

获取原文
       

摘要

Social media, and Twitter in particular, have become important sources for journalists in times of crises. User-generated content (UGC) can provide journalists with on-site information and material they otherwise would not have access to. But how they source and verify UGC has not yet been systematically analyzed. This study analyzes sourcing and verification practices on Twitter during the Brussels attacks in March 2016. Based on quantitative content analysis, we identified (1) the journalists and news organizations sourcing during the attacks, (2) classified different forms of sourcing and verification requests, and (3) analyzed the sourced UGC. Results show that sourcing on Twitter has become a global phenomenon. During the first hours of the attack, journalists rely on UGC. Their sourcing and verification practices vary widely and often lack basic verification procedures, which leads to a discussion about the ethical implications of sourcing practices.
机译:在危机时期,社交媒体,尤其是Twitter,已成为新闻工作者的重要资源。用户生成的内容(UGC)可以为记者提供他们原本无法访问的现场信息和资料。但是,如何对UGC进行来源和验证的方法尚未进行系统的分析。这项研究分析了2016年3月布鲁塞尔攻击期间Twitter上的采购和验证做法。基于定量内容分析,我们确定了(1)在攻击期间进行采购的记者和新闻机构,(2)对不同形式的采购和验证请求进行了分类, (3)分析了来源的UGC。结果表明,在Twitter上进行采购已成为一种全球现象。在袭击的头几个小时,记者依靠教资会。他们的采购和验证实践千差万别,而且通常缺乏基本的验证程序,这导致人们对采购实践的道德影响进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号