...
首页> 外文期刊>Open medicine >?-?-Choice of therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and a sulphonylurea: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis
【24h】

?-?-Choice of therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and a sulphonylurea: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis

机译:α-β-二甲双胍和磺脲类药物控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的治疗选择:系统评价和混合治疗比较荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundMetformin and a sulphonylurea are often used in combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of all available classes of antihyperglycemic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea combination therapy.MethodsMEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials published in English from 1980 to November 2009. Additional citations were obtained from the grey literature and conference proceedings and through stakeholder feedback. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias. Key outcomes of interest were hemoglobin A1c, body weight, hypoglycemia, patients’ satisfaction with treatment, quality of life, long-term diabetes-related complications, withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events and mortality. Mixed-treatment comparison meta-analyses were conducted to calculate mean differences between drug classes for changes in hemoglobin A1c and body weight. When appropriate, pairwise meta-analyses were used to estimate differences for other outcomes.ResultsWe identified 33 randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria. The methodologic quality of the studies was generally poor. Insulins (basal, biphasic, bolus), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) all produced statistically significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c in combination with metformin and a sulphonylurea (–0.89% to –1.17%), whereas meglitinides and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors did not. Biphasic insulin, bolus insulin, and TZDs were associated with weight gain (1.85–5.00 kg), whereas DPP-4 inhibitors and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors were weight-neutral, and GLP-1 analogues were associated with modest weight loss. Treatment regimens containing insulin were associated with increased hypoglycemia relative to comparators, but severe hypoglycemia was rare across all treatments.InterpretationThird-line agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes are similar in terms of glycemic control but differ in their propensity to cause weight gain and hypoglycemia. Longer-term studies with larger sample sizes are required to determine if any of the drug classes are superior with regard to reducing diabetes-related complications.
机译:背景二甲双胍和磺酰脲类经常联合使用以治疗2型糖尿病。我们进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以评估在二甲双胍和磺脲类药物联合治疗控制不充分的2型糖尿病患者中,所有可用的降血糖疗法类别的比较安全性和疗效。方法MEDLINE,MEDLINE进行中及其他非索引引文检索了EMBASE,BIOSIS Previews,PubMed和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册,以查找从1980年至2009年11月以英语发布的随机对照试验。从灰色文献和会议记录以及利益相关者的反馈中获得了其他引用。两名评价者独立选择研究,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。感兴趣的主要结局指标是血红蛋白A1c,体重,低血糖症,患者对治疗的满意度,生活质量,与糖尿病相关的长期并发症,因不良事件引起的戒断,严重不良事件和死亡率。进行了混合处理比较荟萃分析,以计算血红蛋白A1c和体重变化的药物类别之间的平均差异。在适当的情况下,采用成对的荟萃分析来估计其他结局的差异。结果我们确定了33项符合纳入标准的随机对照试验。研究的方法学质量通常较差。胰岛素(基础,两相,大剂量),二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂,胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)类似物和噻唑烷二酮(TZDs)与二甲双胍和二甲双胍合用时,血红蛋白A1c均有统计学显着的降低磺脲类药物(–0.89%至–1.17%),而美格替尼和α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂则没有。双相胰岛素,推注胰岛素和TZD与体重增加(1.85-5.00 kg)相关,而DPP-4抑制剂和α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂与体重无关,而GLP-1类似物与中等程度的体重减轻相关。相对于比较者,含胰岛素的治疗方案与增加的低血糖有关,但在所有治疗中很少发生严重的低血糖。解释在控制血糖方面,用于治疗2型糖尿病的三线药物相似,但引起体重增加和增加的倾向不同。低血糖症。需要进行更大样本量的长期研究,以确定在降低糖尿病相关并发症方面,是否有任何药物类别更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号