...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientifica >Towards an Understanding of Conservation-Based Costs, Benefits, and Attitudes of Local People Living Adjacent to Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe
【24h】

Towards an Understanding of Conservation-Based Costs, Benefits, and Attitudes of Local People Living Adjacent to Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe

机译:津巴布韦对基于保护的成本,收益和与保存谷保护区相邻的当地居民的态度的理解

获取原文
           

摘要

Communities juxtaposed to protected areas (PAs) often disproportionally accrue the costs of conservation, but they can also receive benefits from the existence of a PA. The extent to which local communities benefit or incur costs as a result of residing next to PAs is of interest to conservationists and policy-makers. This study sought to understand the costs, benefits, and attitudes of local people living adjacent to Save Valley Conservancy (SVC), Zimbabwe. The purpose was to determine whether benefit and loss accrual has a bearing on the levels of illicit wildlife-based activities experienced in the SVC. Data were collected through a household questionnaire survey and key informant interviews from April to July 2014. A three-stage sampling was adopted firstly, purposive sampling was employed to select wards adjacent to the SVC; secondly, random sampling was used to select villages within the selected wards; and thirdly, systematic sampling was used to select 71 household questionnaire respondents. Snowball sampling was used to select 9 key informants. The study results show that the majority of locals living close to SVC are not deriving discernable benefits and the costs of conservation are escalating influencing negative attitudes towards wildlife conservation, thus causing them to view wildlife as a nuisance. Overall, our results indicate that conservation losses and benefit accrual by local communities influence their attitudes toward SVC and conservation in general. We conclude that costs incurred outweighed the benefits accrued, a situation that triggers a more negative form of reciprocity towards SVC and wildlife conservation. It is recommended that a more socially and economically inclusive management approach based on a stakeholder-driven access and benefit sharing (ABS) framework be instituted to promote a more positive form of reciprocity towards SVC and nature conservation.
机译:与保护区并列的社区通常会不成比例地增加保护成本,但他们也可以从保护区的存在中受益。保护主义者和政策制定者对当地居民因居住在保护区附近而在多大程度上受益或招致成本感到兴趣。这项研究旨在了解与津巴布韦的Save Valley Conservancy(SVC)相邻的当地居民的成本,收益和态度。目的是确定应计收益和损失是否与SVC中经历的基于野生动植物的非法活动的水平有关。数据通过2014年4月至2014年7月的家庭问卷调查和关键知情人访谈收集。首先采用三阶段抽样,采用目的抽样选择与SVC相邻的病房。其次,采用随机抽样的方法在选定病房内选择村庄。第三,采用系统抽样的方法选择了71名家庭问卷调查对象。雪球采样用于选择9名关键线人。研究结果表明,居住在SVC附近的大多数当地人并未获得明显的收益,保护成本正在上升,从而影响了人们对野生动植物保护的消极态度,从而使他们将野生动植物视为令人讨厌的事情。总体而言,我们的结果表明,当地社区的保护损失和收益累积会影响他们对SVC和保护的总体态度。我们得出的结论是,产生的成本超过了应产生的收益,这种情况引发了对SVC和野生动植物保护的更负面的互惠形式。建议采用基于利益相关者驱动的获取和利益分享(ABS)框架的更具社会和经济包容性的管理方法,以促进对SVC和自然保护的更积极的互惠形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号