...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >Lung ultrasound versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in critically ill patients: A prospective, single-blind study
【24h】

Lung ultrasound versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in critically ill patients: A prospective, single-blind study

机译:肺部超声与胸部X线摄影对重症患者气胸的诊断:一项前瞻性,单盲研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Radiologic data remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of pneumothorax (PTX). The use of ultrasonography (US) has recently emerged as the method of choice with physicians who can perform bedside US. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of lung US against bedside chest radiography (CR) for the detection of PTX using thoracic computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-blind study on 192 critically ill patients; each patient received lung US examination, bedside CR, followed by thoracic CT scan searching for PTX. Results: Of the studied patients, CT of the chest confirmed the diagnosis of PTX in 36 (18.75%) patients of which 31 were diagnosed by thoracic US while CR detected only 19 cases. Overall lung US showed a considerable higher sensitivity than bedside CR (86.1% vs. 52.7%), lung US also showed higher, negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy against CR (96.8% vs. 90.1%), and (95.3% vs. 90.6%), respectively. CR had a slightly higher specificity than lung US (99.4% vs. 97.4%), and higher positive predictive values (95.0% vs. 88.6%). Conclusion: Lung US is an accurate modality more than anteroposterior bedside CR in comparison with CT scanning when evaluating critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, patients underwent thoracocentesis, central venous catheter insertion, or patients with polytrauma.
机译:背景:放射学数据仍然是诊断气胸(PTX)的金标准。超声检查(US)的使用最近已经成为可以在床边进行US检查的医生的选择方法。目的:比较以胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)为金标准的肺部US与床旁胸部X线(CR)诊断PTX的诊断准确性。材料和方法:我们对192名重症患者进行了前瞻性,单盲研究。每位患者均接受了肺部US检查,床旁CR,然后进行胸部CT扫描以寻找PTX。结果:在研究的患者中,胸部CT证实了36例(18.75%)患者中PTX的诊断,其中31例由胸腔超声确诊,而CR仅检测到19例。总体而言,肺部US的敏感性高于床旁CR(86.1%比52.7%),肺部US也显示出更高的阴性预测值和针对CR的诊断准确性(96.8%对90.1%)和(95.3%对CT)。 90.6%)。 CR的特异性比肺US略高(99.4%比97.4%),阳性预测值也更高(95.0%比88.6%)。结论:在评估危重机械通气患者,接受胸腔穿刺术,中心静脉导管插入患者或多发伤患者时,与CT扫描相比,肺US比床旁CR更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号