...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal >Investigation of the efficacy of generic and brand-name tiotropium bromide in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized comparative trial
【24h】

Investigation of the efficacy of generic and brand-name tiotropium bromide in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized comparative trial

机译:通用名牌噻托溴铵在慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中的功效研究:一项随机对照试验

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: The beneficial effects of tiotropium bromide, a long acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been shown in previous studies. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic (Tiova(R)) and brand-name (Spiriva(R)) tiotropium preparations in patients with COPD. Methods and materials: In this randomized double-blind parallel-group trial, 79 patients with documented COPD were assigned to Tiova(R) or Spiriva(R) for a period of 4weeks. Assessment of pulmonary function (using spirometry), quality-of-life (using St. George respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]) and severity of respiratory symptoms (using breathlessness, cough and sputum scale [BCSS]) was performed at baseline and at the end of treatment period. Results: There were significant increases in FEV"1 and reductions in FVC by the end of study in both Tiova(R) and Spiriva(R) groups. FEV"1/FVC ratio did not change significantly neither in the Tiova(R) nor in Spiriva(R) group. Overall SGRQ score as well as subscale scores of symptoms, activity and impacts were improved by both drugs. In the BCSS scale, the frequency and severity of three main symptoms (dyspnea, cough and sputum) was decreased by both drugs. Baseline as well as post-treatment values of spirometric parameters, SGRQ and BCSS scores was comparable between the groups, apart from a lower post-treatment frequency of cough and sputum in the Spiriva(R) versus Tiova(R) group. There was no report of adverse events in either of the study groups. Conclusion: The findings of this comparative trial showed equivalent efficacy and safety of Spiriva(R) and Tiova(R) in lessening the symptoms as well as improving the quality of life in patients with COPD. This finding has an important translational value given the significantly lower costs of generic versus brand-name products.
机译:简介:噻托溴铵(一种长效抗胆碱能支气管扩张药)在控制慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的有益作用已得到证实。本研究旨在比较普通(Tiova(R))和商标名(Spiriva(R))噻托溴铵制剂在COPD患者中的疗效和安全性。方法和材料:在这项随机双盲平行组试验中,将79名COPD记录患者分配为Tiova(R)或Spiriva(R)4周。在基线和末期评估肺功能(使用肺活量测定法),生活质量(使用圣乔治呼吸问卷[SGRQ])和呼吸系统症状严重程度(使用呼吸困难,咳嗽和痰量表[BCSS])治疗期。结果:到研究结束时,Tiova(R)和Spiriva(R)组的FEV“ 1显着增加,FVC降低。在Tiova®和Spiova中,FEV” 1 / FVC的比例均无显着变化。在Spiriva(R)组中。两种药物均改善了SGRQ的总体评分以及症状,活动和影响的分量表评分。在BCSS量表中,两种药物均降低了三种主要症状(呼吸困难,咳嗽和痰)的频率和严重程度。两组之间的肺活量参数,SGRQ和BCSS分数的基线以及治疗后的值在两组之间具有可比性,除了Spiriva(R)和Tiova(R)组中咳嗽和痰的治疗后频率较低。在两个研究组中都没有不良事件的报道。结论:该比较试验的结果表明Spiriva(R)和Tiova(R)在减轻COPD患者的症状以及改善生活质量方面具有同等效力和安全性。鉴于非专利药和品牌药的成本大大降低,这一发现具有重要的转化价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号