...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of OphthalmologybElectronic resource >Comparison of manual and femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy procedures for the correction of post-keratoplasty astigmatism
【24h】

Comparison of manual and femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy procedures for the correction of post-keratoplasty astigmatism

机译:手动和飞秒激光弧形角膜切开术的比较,用于矫正角膜移植术后的散光

获取原文

摘要

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness of femtosecond laser (FSL) assisted and manual arcuate keratotomy (AK) procedures for the correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.MethodsFifty-two eyes (52 patients) were treated with FSL assisted AK and 53 eyes (51 patients) with manual AK for post-keratoplasty astigmatism. The main outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), corneal topography and complications.ResultsIn FSL group, UDVA changed significantly from 0.90?±?0.43 preoperatively to 0.60?±?0.39 at last follow-up (p?=?0.001). In manual group, preop- (0.87?±?0.35) and post-operative UDVA (0.93?±?042) were comparable (p?=?0.535). CDVA improved from 0.30?±?0.18 preoperatively to 0.20?±?0.14 at last follow-up visit in FSL group (0.014) and 0.28?±?0.15 preoperative to 0.23?±?0.19 at last postoperative visit (0.074) in manual group. Postoperative UDVA and CDVA were comparable between both the groups (p?>?0.05). The mean preoperative refractive cylinder was 6.38?±?3.73 and 7.15?±?132, decreasing significantly to 5.06?±?2.06 and 5.19?±?2.25 after manual and FSL assisted AK procedures respectively. Mean change in the refractive cylinder was ?1.10?±?4.11 in manual AK group and ?2.19?±?2.35 in FSL group (p?=?0.134). Perforation, overcorrection and regression occurred in respectively 3 eyes (5.8%), 12 eyes (23.07%) and 1 eye (1.92%) in FSL group and 1 eye (1.9%; macro-perforation), 7 eyes (13.21%) and 8 eyes (15.09%) in manual group. Additionally, in the manual group, severe ectasia occurred in 1 eye (1.9%).ConclusionFSL assisted AK procedure is comparable or to a certain extent better regarding safety and efficacy than manual AK procedure. Postoperatively, FSL resulted in better outcomes of UCVA, BCVA, refractive cylinder and keratometric astigmatism compared to the manual AK procedures; although, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant.
机译:目的比较飞秒激光(FSL)辅助和人工弓形角膜切开术(AK)矫正角膜塑形术后散光的效果。方法52眼(52例)接受FSL辅助AK治疗,53眼(51例)人工AK接受治疗。用于角膜移植术后散光。主要结局指标包括术前和术后明显的屈光度,未矫正和矫正的远视力(UDVA,CDVA),角膜地形图和并发症。结果FSL组的UDVA从术前的0.90±0.43明显改变为最后的0.60±0.39。随访(p≥0.001)。在手动组中,术前(0.87±±0.35)和术后UDVA(0.93±±042)是可比较的(p≥0.535)。 FSL组(0.014)的CDVA从术前的0.30±±0.18改善为0.20±±0.14(0.014),人工组的CDVA从术前的0.28±±0.19改善为0.23±0.19(0.074)。 。两组的术后UDVA和CDVA相当(p≥0.05)。术前平均屈光度数为6.38±±3.73和7.15±±132,在手动和FSL辅助AK手术后,平均屈光度分别降至5.06±±2.06和5.19±±2.25。手动AK组屈光柱的平均变化为<1.10±±4.11,而FSL组为<2.19±±2.35(p≥0.134)。 FSL组分别有3眼(5.8%),12眼(23.07%)和1眼(1.92%)和1眼(1.9%;宏观穿孔),7眼(13.21%)和13眼发生穿孔,过度矫正和消退。手动组8眼(15.09%)。另外,在手工组中,严重的扩张发生在一只眼睛中(1.9%)。结论FSL辅助AK手术在安全性和有效性方面比手工AK手术相当或在一定程度上更好。与手动AK手术相比,FSL术后产生的UCVA,BCVA,屈光柱和角膜散光效果更好。尽管两组之间的差异在统计学上不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号