...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of primary health care. >Streptococcal Throat Infection: Calculation of Test Standards and a Comparison between an Antigen Detection Test and Culture
【24h】

Streptococcal Throat Infection: Calculation of Test Standards and a Comparison between an Antigen Detection Test and Culture

机译:链球菌性喉咙感染:测试标准的计算以及抗原检测测试与培养之间的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The standard minimum sensitivity (94%) and minimum specificity (89%) of a group A streptococcus (GAS) test were calculated, assuming that no more than 10% false positive and no more than 2% false negative test results should be allowed. The clinical judgement of the need for immediate antibiotic treatment in tonsillitis/pharyngitis was an unreliable indicator of a GAS aetiology, 20–29% of the results being false positive and 2–10% false negative. The rapid antigen detection test Tandem Icon Strep A was not sensitive enough to be used as a single test, though it was specific enough. The sensitivity of culture almost reached the standard demand. Two combinations of rapid test and culture (sequence testing) were superior to the rapid test, but were not significantly better than culture.
机译:计算了A组链球菌(GAS)测试的标准最低灵敏度(94%)和最低特异性(89%),并假设假阳性结果不超过10%,假阴性结果不超过2%。扁桃体炎/咽炎需要立即抗生素治疗的临床判断是GAS病因的不可靠指标,其中20–29%的结果为假阳性,而2-10%的结果为假阴性。快速抗原检测试验Tandem Icon Strep A尽管足够特异性,但灵敏度不高,无法用作单一试验。文化的敏感性几乎达到了标准要求。快速测试和培养(顺序测试)的两种组合均优于快速测试,但并没有明显优于培养。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号