首页> 外文期刊>Sage Open Medicine >The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities:
【24h】

The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities:

机译:堕胎和精神健康方面的争议:关于共同点协议,分歧,可行建议和研究机会的综合文献综述:

获取原文
           

摘要

The abortion and mental health controversy is driven by two different perspectives regarding how best to interpret accepted facts. When interpreting the data, abortion and mental health proponents are inclined to emphasize risks associated with abortion, whereas abortion and mental health minimalists emphasize pre-existing risk factors as the primary explanation for the correlations with more negative outcomes. Still, both sides agree that (a) abortion is consistently associated with elevated rates of mental illness compared to women without a history of abortion; (b) the abortion experience directly contributes to mental health problems for at least some women; (c) there are risk factors, such as pre-existing mental illness, that identify women at greatest risk of mental health problems after an abortion; and (d) it is impossible to conduct research in this field in a manner that can definitively identify the extent to which any mental illnesses following abortion can be reliably attributed to abortion i...
机译:关于如何最好地解释公认事实的两种不同观点推动了堕胎和心理健康的争论。在解释数据时,堕胎和心理健康的支持者倾向于强调与堕胎相关的风险,而堕胎和心理健康的极简主义者则强调预先存在的风险因素,作为与更多负面结果相关的主要解释。双方仍然同意:(a)与没有堕胎史的妇女相比,堕胎与精神疾病的发生率持续升高有关; (b)流产的经历直接导致至少某些妇女的心理健康问题; (c)有一些风险因素,例如既存的精神疾病,可以确定流产后妇女面临精神健康问题的最大风险; (d)不可能以能够明确确定堕胎后任何精神疾病可可靠地归因于堕胎的程度进行此领域的研究...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号