首页> 外文期刊>Scanning >Microscopic Features of Fractured Fragment of Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments by Two Different Modes of Torsional Loading
【24h】

Microscopic Features of Fractured Fragment of Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments by Two Different Modes of Torsional Loading

机译:两种不同加载方式的镍钛牙髓器械断裂片段的微观特征

获取原文
           

摘要

This study compared the microscopic features of the fractured endodontic nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments by two different torsional loadings repetitive torsional loading (RTL) and single torsional loading (STL) based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ProTaper Next, HyFlex EDM, and V-Taper 2 were compared in this study. In the STL method, the torsional load was applied after fixing the 3 mm tip of the file, by continuous clockwise rotation (2 rpm) until fracture. In the RTL method, a preset rotational loading (0.5 N·cm) was applied and the clockwise loading to the preset torque and counterclockwise unloading to original position were repeated at 50 rpm until the file fractured. Fractured fragments by two methods were compared under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to examine the topographic features of the fractured surfaces and longitudinal aspects. SEM examinations showed significantly different features according to the loading methods. Specimens from the RTL method showed ruptured aspects on cross sections, with multiple areas of initiated cracks while the STL method showed the typical features of torsional failure, such as circular abrasion marks and fatigue dimples. This study suggested a new repetitive torsional loading method which is much more clinically relevant and may result in a different fracture feature from STL method.
机译:这项研究根据国际标准化组织(ISO),通过两种不同的扭转载荷,重复扭转载荷(RTL)和单一扭转载荷(STL),比较了骨折的牙髓镍钛合金(NiTi)旋转仪的微观特征。接下来,对ProTaper,HyFlex EDM和V-Taper 2进行了比较。在STL方法中,在固定锉刀3毫米的尖端后,通过连续顺时针旋转(2 rpm)直到断裂,施加了扭转载荷。在RTL方法中,施加了预设的旋转载荷(0.5 N·cm),并以50 rpm的速度重复了顺时针加载到预设扭矩和逆时针卸载到原始位置的操作,直到锉刀破裂。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下比较两种方法的断裂片段,以检查断裂表面和纵向方面的形貌特征。 SEM检查显示,根据加载方法的不同,特征明显不同。 RTL方法的样品显示出横截面的破裂部分,具有多个引发裂纹的区域,而STL方法则显示出扭转破坏的典型特征,例如圆形磨损痕迹和疲劳凹痕。这项研究提出了一种新的重复扭转加载方法,该方法在临床上更为相关,并且可能导致与STL方法不同的骨折特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号