...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT)
【24h】

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT)

机译:机械或手动胸外按压治疗非惊厥性心律失常的院内心脏骤停患者:一项随机对照可行性试验(COMPRESS-RCT)

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Mechanical chest compression devices consistently deliver high-quality chest compressions. Small very low-quality studies suggest mechanical devices may be effective as an alternative to manual chest compressions in the treatment of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. The aim of this feasibility trial is to assess the feasibility of conducting an effectiveness trial in this patient population. COMPRESS-RCT is a multi-centre parallel group feasibility randomised controlled trial, designed to assess the feasibility of undertaking an effectiveness to compare the effect of mechanical chest compressions with manual chest compressions on 30-day survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest. Over approximately two years, 330 adult patients who sustain an in-hospital cardiac arrest and are in a non-shockable rhythm will be randomised in a 3:1 ratio to receive ongoing treatment with a mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS 2/3, Jolife AB/Stryker, Lund, Sweden) or continued manual chest compressions. It is intended that recruitment will occur on a 24/7 basis by the clinical cardiac arrest team. The primary study outcome is the proportion of eligible participants randomised in the study during site operational recruitment hours. Participants will be enrolled using a model of deferred consent, with consent for follow-up sought from patients or their consultee in those that survive the cardiac arrest event. The trial will have an embedded qualitative study, in which we will conduct semi-structured interviews with hospital staff to explore facilitators and barriers to study recruitment. The findings of COMPRESS-RCT will provide important information about the deliverability of an effectiveness trial to evaluate the effect on 30-day mortality of routine use of mechanical chest compression devices in adult in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. ISRCTN38139840 , date of registration 9th January 2017.
机译:机械式胸部按压设备始终如一地提供高质量的胸部按压。小型的非常低质量的研究表明,机械装置可以代替成人手动胸外按压来治疗成人院内心脏骤停患者。该可行性试验的目的是评估在该患者人群中进行有效性试验的可行性。 COMPRESS-RCT是一项多中心平行小组可行性随机对照试验,旨在评估比较院内心脏骤停后机械胸部按压与手动胸部按压对30天生存率的影响的可行性。在大约两年的时间里,将对330名维持院内心脏骤停且心律不休的成年患者按3:1的比例进行随机分配,以接受机械式胸部按压设备的持续治疗(LUCAS 2/3,Jolife AB / Stryker,瑞典隆德)或继续进行手动胸部按压。预期临床心脏骤停团队将按24/7进行招募。主要研究结果是在现场运营募集时间内随机纳入研究的合格参与者的比例。将使用延迟同意的模型招募参与者,并征得患者或其被咨询者对在心脏骤停事件中幸存者的随访。该试验将进行嵌入的定性研究,在该研究中,我们将与医院工作人员进行半结构化访谈,以探讨促进招募的因素和障碍。 COMPRESS-RCT的发现将提供有关有效性试验的可交付性的重要信息,以评估成人住院心脏骤停患者常规使用机械胸部按压设备对30天死亡率的影响。 ISRCTN38139840,注册日期2017年1月9日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号