首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study
【24h】

A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study

机译:荷兰院前急诊医疗服务国家研究议程:一项德尔菲研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background In pre-hospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) more research is needed to direct and underpin care delivery and inform policy. To target future research efforts, this study aimed to determine future research priorities with representatives of the EMS field. Methods A four-round online Delphi survey was used to discuss different viewpoints and reach consensus on research priorities. A multidisciplinary panel of experts was recruited in the field of pre-hospital EMS and adjoining (scientific) professional organisations ( n =?62). 48 research topics were presented in Delphi I, and the panel was asked to rate their importance on a 5-point scale. In Delphi II and III the panel selected their priority research topics, and arguments why and suggestions for research questions were collected and reported back. In Delphi IV appropriateness of the remaining topics and agreement within the expert panel was taken into account to make up the final list of research priorities. Results The response on the Delphi-survey was high: 95?% ( n =?59; Delphi I); 97?% ( n =?60, Delphi II); 94?% ( n =?58, Delphi III); 97?% ( n =?60, Delphi IV). The panel reduced the number of research topics from 48 topics in Delphi I to 12 topics in Delphi III. A variety of arguments and suggestions for research questions were collected, giving insight in reasons why research on these topics in the near future is needed. Delphi IV showed an adequate level of agreement with respect to the 12 presented research topics. The following 9 topics were rated as appropriate for the national pre-hospital EMS research agenda: Non-conveyance to the hospital (ranked highest); Performance measures for quality of care; Hand over/registration/exchange of patient data; Care and task substitution; Triage; Assessment of acute neurologic signs & symptoms; Protocols and protocol adherence; Immobilisation; and Open/secure airway. Discussions The research priorities identified in our study resemble those in other studies. However, the topic 'non-conveyance to the hospital' was determined as a priority in this study but not in other studies. Conclusions The national pre-hospital EMS research agenda can focus future research efforts to improve the evidence base and clinical practice of pre-hospital emergency medical services. Dissemination and implementation of the research agenda deserves careful attention.
机译:背景技术在院前急诊医疗服务(EMS)中,需要进行更多研究以指导和支持医疗服务的提供并为政策提供信息。为了针对未来的研究工作,本研究旨在与EMS领域的代表确定未来的研究重点。方法采用四轮在线德尔菲调查,讨论不同观点并就研究重点达成共识。在院前急诊医疗服务及相关(科学)专业组织领域招募了一个多学科的专家小组(n = 62)。在Delphi I中提出了48个研究主题,并要求小组以5分制对他们的重要性进行评分。在Delphi II和III中,小组选择了他们的优先研究主题,并论证了为何收集了研究问题并提出了建议,并向他们汇报。在《德尔菲四世》中,考虑了其余主题的适当性和专家小组内部的协议,以构成研究重点的最终清单。结果德尔菲调查的响应率很高:95%(n =?59;德尔菲一世)。 97%(n =?60,德尔福二世); 94%(n =?58,德尔菲三世); 97%(n =≤60,Delphi IV)。该小组将研究主题的数量从Delphi I中的48个主题减少到Delphi III中的12个主题。收集了各种有关研究问题的论据和建议,从而洞悉了在不久的将来需要对这些主题进行研究的原因。德尔福四世就所提出的12个研究课题表现出足够的共识。以下9个主题被评定为​​适合国家院前EMS研究议程:不向医院运送药物(排名最高);护理质量的绩效衡量;移交/注册/交换患者数据;护理和任务替代;分流;评估急性神经系统症状和体征;协议和协议遵守;固定;和开放/安全气道。讨论在我们的研究中确定的研究重点与其他研究相似。但是,本研究确定了“不运送至医院”为主题,而其他研究则没有。结论国家院前EMS研究议程可将未来研究重点放在改善院前急诊医疗服务的证据基础和临床实践上。研究议程的传播和实施值得认真注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号