...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU?)
【24h】

Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU?)

机译:Navarra主要创伤登记处和德国创伤登记处(TR-DGU?)的流行病学比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

International benchmarking can help identify trauma system performance issues and determine the extent to which other countries also experience these. When problems are identified, countries can look to high performers for insight into possible responses. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment and outcome of severely injured patients in Germany and Navarra, Spain. Data collected, from 2010 to 2013, in the Navarra Major Trauma Registry (NMTR) and the TraumaRegister DGU? (TR-DGU) were compared. Both registries followed the Utstein Trauma Template (European Core Dataset) for documentation of trauma patients. Adult patients (≥ 16?years) with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) being >15 points were included in this study. Patients who had been admitted to the hospital later than 24?h after the trauma, had been pronounced dead before hospital arrival, or had been injured by hanging, drowning or burns, were excluded. Demographic data, injury data, prehospital data, hospital treatment data, time intervals, and outcome were compared. The expected mortality was calculated using the Revised Injury Severity Classification score II (RISC II). A total of 646 and 43,110 patients were included in the outcome analysis from NMTR and TR-DGU, respectively. The difference between observed and expected mortality was ?0.4% (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–1.04) in Germany and 1.6% (SMR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02–1.14) in Navarra. Differences in the characteristics of trauma patients and trauma systems between the regions were noted. The higher observed mortality in Navarra is consistent with the epidemiological characteristics of its population. However, to improve the quality of trauma care in the Navarra trauma system, certain improvements are necessary. There were less young adults with severe injuries in Navarra than in Germany. It is possible to compare data of severely injured patients from different countries if standardized registries are used.
机译:国际基准可以帮助确定创伤系统性能问题,并确定其他国家也经历这些问题的程度。发现问题后,各国可以寻求高绩效人员来洞悉可能的对策。这项研究的目的是比较德国和西班牙纳瓦拉的重伤患者的治疗方法和结果。从2010年到2013年在Navarra主要创伤登记处(NMTR)和TraumaRegister DGU中收集的数据? (TR-DGU)进行了比较。两个注册表都遵循Utstein创伤模板(欧洲核心数据集)来记录创伤患者。新损伤严重程度评分(NISS)> 15分的成年患者(≥16岁)被纳入本研究。创伤发生后24小时后才入院,在医院到达之前被宣布死亡或因吊死,溺水或烧伤受伤的患者被排除在外。比较了人口统计学数据,伤害数据,院前数据,医院治疗数据,时间间隔和结果。使用修订的伤害严重度分级评分II(RISC II)计算预期死亡率。 NMTR和TR-DGU分别进行了646和43,110例患者的结局分析。在德国,观察到的死亡率与预期死亡率之间的差异约为0.4%(标准死亡率[SMR] 0.97; 95%CI 0.93–1.04),在Navarra中,差异为1.6%(SMR 1.08; 95%CI:1.02-1.14)。注意到各地区之间创伤患者和创伤系统的特征差异。在纳瓦拉观察到的较高死亡率与其人群的流行病学特征相符。但是,为了提高Navarra创伤系统中创伤护理的质量,必须进行某些改进。纳瓦拉遭受严重伤害的年轻人比德国少。如果使用标准注册表,则可以比较来自不同国家的重伤患者的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号