...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Hospital level variations in the trends and outcomes of the nonoperative management of splenic injuries – a nationwide cohort study
【24h】

Hospital level variations in the trends and outcomes of the nonoperative management of splenic injuries – a nationwide cohort study

机译:医院水平对脾损伤非手术治疗的趋势和结果的变化–一项全国队列研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The long-term treatment trends of splenic injuries can provide guidance when treating trauma patients. The nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injuries was introduced in early 1989. After decades of development, it has proven to be safe and is now the primary treatment choice worldwide. However, there remains a lack of nationwide registry data to support the feasibility and efficiency of NOM. We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to conduct a whole population-based cohort study. Patients admitted with blunt splenic injuries from 2002 to 2013 were identified. Demographic data, management methods, associated injuries, comorbidities and outcome parameters were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups by the type of admitting institution: a tertiary center or a non-center hospital. We also used 4?years as an interval to analyze the changes in epidemiological data and treatment trends. Comparisons of the results of NOM and surgical management were also performed. A total of 12,455 patients were admitted with blunt splenic injuries between 2002 and 2013. Among the 11,551 patients treated in a single hospital after admission, patients underwent NOM more frequently at tertiary centers than at non-center hospitals (64.6% vs 50.3%). During the 12-year study period, the NOM rate increased from 56 to 73% in tertiary centers, while in noncenter hospitals, the rate only increased from 43 to 58%. The mortality rate decreased in tertiary centers from 8.9 to 7.2%, with no apparent change in noncenter hospitals. Complications occurred more frequently in the surgical management group. There is a trend toward the use of NOM for blunt splenic injury treatments, and the outcomes from the NOM groups were not inferior to those of the operation group. In addition, tertiary centers performed more NOM than did non-center hospitals and better met the international consensus.
机译:脾损伤的长期治疗趋势可为治疗创伤患者提供指导。脾损伤的非手术治疗(NOM)于1989年初引入。经过几十年的发展,它已被证明是安全的,现在已成为全世界的主要治疗选择。但是,仍然缺乏全国性的注册表数据来支持NOM的可行性和效率。我们使用台湾国民健康保险研究数据库进行了整个人群的队列研究。确定从2002年至2013年接受钝性脾损伤的患者。收集了人口统计学数据,管理方法,相关伤害,合并症和结局参数。根据入院机构的类型将患者分为两组:三级中心医院或非中心医院。我们还以4年为间隔来分析流行病学数据和治疗趋势的变化。还比较了NOM和手术治疗的结果。在2002年至2013年之间,共有12,455例因钝性脾损伤而入院。入院后在一家医院接受治疗的11,551例患者中,三级中心患者接受NOM的频率高于非中心医院(64.6%vs 50.3%)。在为期12年的研究期间,三级中心的NOM比率从56%上升到73%,而在非中心医院,该比率仅从43%上升到58%。三级中心的死亡率从8.9%下降到7.2%,非中心医院没有明显变化。并发症在外科手术治疗组中更常见。使用NOM进行钝性脾损伤治疗的趋势已经出现,并且NOM组的结果并不逊色于手术组。此外,三级中心的NOM数量要比非中心医院多,并且更好地达到了国际共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号