首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Comparison of Graft Length Changes During Knee Motion Among 5 Different Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Approaches: A Biomechanical Study
【24h】

Comparison of Graft Length Changes During Knee Motion Among 5 Different Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Approaches: A Biomechanical Study

机译:5种不同解剖学上的单束前交叉韧带重建方法在膝关节运动期间移植物长度变化的比较:一项生物力学研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: In several anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ASB-ACLR) procedures, the femoral and tibial tunnel apertures are created at different locations within the native ACL attachment area. Hypothesis: Graft length changes during knee motion will be different among ASB-ACLR procedures with different femoral and tibial tunnel aperture locations. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 12 cadaveric knees were used in this study. In each knee, 4 and 3 thin tunnels were created within the ACL attachment area on the femur and the tibia, respectively. Using 1 of 5 different combinations of femoral and tibial tunnel aperture location, 5 ASB-ACLRs were performed on each knee. In each reconstruction approach, a strong thread was used in place of the tendon graft, and the tibial graft end was tethered to a custom-made isometric positioner at 0° of knee flexion, with an approximately 12-N load applied to the thread. Then, each specimen underwent 5 cycles of knee flexion-extension motion in a range between 0° and 120°, and graft length changes were determined for each SB-ACLR approach. Results: The length changes of the graft were significantly different among the 5 ASB-ACLRs. The maximum length change values of the 3 grafts that were implanted between the femoral and tibial centers of the posterolateral bundle attachments or implanted into the femoral tunnel created at the center of the fanlike extension fiber attachment were significantly greater than those of the graft implanted between the centers of the anteromedial bundle attachments ( P & .0001) and of the graft implanted between the centers of the whole ACL attachments ( P & .0001). Conclusion: The length changes of the graft during knee motion were significantly different among the 5 ASB-ACLR approaches, even though all of the tunnel apertures were created within the femoral and tibial attachments of the native ACL. Clinical Relevance: The grafts in the first 3 graft locations may be so relaxed during knee flexion that they cannot resist anterior drawer loads exerted on the tibia.
机译:背景:在几个解剖学上的单束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ASB-ACLR)程序中,在天然ACL附着区域内的不同位置创建了股骨和胫骨隧道孔。假设:在具有不同股骨和胫骨隧道孔位置的ASB-ACLR手术中,膝关节运动期间的接骨长度变化会有所不同。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:本研究共使用了12个尸体膝盖。在每个膝盖上,分别在股骨和胫骨的ACL附着区域内创建了4个和3个细隧道。使用5个不同的股骨和胫骨隧道孔位置组合中的1个,在每个膝盖上进行5个ASB-ACLR。在每种重建方法中,都使用一根坚固的线代替腱移植物,并将胫骨移植物的末端在屈膝0度时拴接到定制的等距定位器上,并在该线上施加大约12 N的载荷。然后,每个样本在0°和120°之间的范围内进行5个膝盖屈伸运动,并针对每种SB-ACLR方法确定移植物长度变化。结果:5个ASB-ACLR之间的移植物长度变化显着不同。植入在后外侧束附件的股骨和胫骨中心之间或植入到扇形延伸纤维附件中心处的股骨隧道中的3根移植物的最大长度变化值明显大于植入在股骨头之间的3种移植物的最大长度变化值。内侧束附件的中心(P <.0001)和植入在整个ACL附件的中心之间的移植物的中心(P <.0001)。结论:在5种ASB-ACLR方法中,即使所有的隧道孔均在天然ACL的股骨和胫骨附件内形成,在膝关节运动期间,移植物的长度变化也存在显着差异。临床意义:膝关节屈曲过程中,前三个移植物位置的移植物可能非常松弛,以至于它们无法抵抗施加在胫骨上的前抽屉负荷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号