首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
【24h】

Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up

机译:关节镜旋转袖带伴或不伴手膜成形术的随机前瞻性试验:长期随访患者报告的结果无差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. Methods: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromioplasty or non-acromioplasty groups. Patients with death, advanced neurologic conditions, or subsequent shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline and long-term follow-up questionnaires, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Constant scores were obtained. Rates of revision rotator cuff surgery, or secondary reoperation were recorded. Averages with standard deviation (SD) were calculated, and t-tests were utilized to compare outcomes of interest between cohorts. Results: After exclusion of 5 additional patients from the short-term follow-up study, 66 of 90 patients (73.3%) were available at 92.4 months (±10.5). Comparison of baseline demographics and intraoperative information revealed no significant differences, including age, gender, workers compensation, acute mechanism of injury, tear size, degree of retraction, and surgical technique (e.g. single- vs. double-row). At final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences according to ASES (p=0.33), VAS pain (p=0.79), Constant (p=0.17), SST (p=0.05), UCLA (p=0.19), and SF-12 (p=0.79) in patients with and without acromioplasty (Figure 1). One patient with acromioplasty (2.9%) and two patients without acromioplasty (6.3%) sustained atraumatic recurrent rotator cuff tear with secondary repair (p=0.99). Conclusion: Combined acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair offer no significant long-term benefits in patient-reported outcomes or secondary surgery when compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone. Figure 1.
机译:目的:评估关节镜下肩袖修复术后是否进行肩峰成形术的长期临床结果。方法:在2007年至2011年之间,将接受前瞻性入组的全厚度肩袖撕裂接受关节镜检查的患者先前随机分为肩部成形术组或非肩峰成形术组。患有死亡,神经系统疾病晚期或随后的肩关节置换术的患者被排除在外。基线和长期随访调查表,包括美国肩膀和肘部外科医生(ASES),简单肩膀测验(SST),加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA),视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛和恒定评分获得了。记录翻修肩袖手术或二次再手术的发生率。计算具有标准偏差(SD)的平均值,并使用t检验比较各组之间的关注结果。结果:从短期随访研究中排除了5名额外患者后,在92.4个月(±10.5)时有90名患者中的66名(73.3%)可以使用。基线人口统计学和术中信息的比较显示没有显着差异,包括年龄,性别,工人补偿,急性损伤机制,眼泪大小,收缩程度和手术技术(例如单排或双​​排)。在最后的随访中,根据ASES(p = 0.33),VAS疼痛(p = 0.79),Constant(p = 0.17),SST(p = 0.05),UCLA(p = 0.19),和没有进行肩部成形术的患者中SF-12(p = 0.79)(图1)。 1例行肩峰成形术的患者(2.9%)和2例不行肩峰成形术的患者(6.3%)持续无创复发性肩袖撕裂并进行二次修复(p = 0.99)。结论:与仅使用关节镜检查的肩袖修复术相比,肩峰成形术和肩袖修复术的结合在患者报告的结局或继发手术中没有明显的长期益处。图1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号