首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >The h-Index of Editorial Board Members Correlates Positively With the Impact Factor of Sports Medicine Journals
【24h】

The h-Index of Editorial Board Members Correlates Positively With the Impact Factor of Sports Medicine Journals

机译:编辑委员会成员的h指数与运动医学期刊的影响因素呈正相关

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The h-index is a metric widely used to present both the productivity and impact of an author’s previous publications.Purpose:To evaluate and observe any correlations among the h-indices of 2015 editorial board members from 8 top sports medicine journals.Study Design:Systematic review.Methods:The sex, country of residence, degree, and faculty position of the editorial board members were identified using their respective scientific publication profiles. The h-index and other bibliometric indicators of these editorial board members were obtained using both the Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar (GS) databases. Nonparametric statistics were used to analyze differences in h-index values, and regression models were used to assess the ability of the editorial board member’s h-index to predict their journal’s impact factor (IF).Results:A total of 422 editorial board members were evaluated. The median h-index of all editors was 20 (interquartile range [IQR], 19) using GS and 15 (IQR, 15) using WoS. GS h-index values were 1.19 times higher than WoS, with significant correlation between these values (r2 = 0.88, P = .0001). Editorial board members with a PhD had significantly higher h-indices than those without (GS, P = .0007; WoS, P = .0002), and full professors had higher h-indices than associate and assistant professors (GS, P = .0001; WoS, P = .0001). Overall, there were significant differences in the distribution of the GS (P < .0001) and WoS (P < .0001) h-indices of the editorial board members by 2014 IF of the journals. Both the GS h-index (β coefficient, 0.01228; 95% CI, 0.01035-0.01423; P < .0001) as well as the WoS h-index (β coefficient, 0.01507; 95% CI, 0.01265-0.01749; P < .0001) of editorial board members were significant predictors of the 2014 IF of their journal.Conclusion:The h-indices of editorial board members of top sports medicine journals are significant predictors of the IF of their respective journals.
机译:背景:h指数是一种广泛用于呈现作者先前出版物的生产率和影响力的指标。目的:评估和观察来自8种顶级运动医学期刊的2015年编委会成员的h指数之间的任何相关性。设计:系统回顾。方法:使用各自的科学出版物资料确定编辑委员会成员的性别,居住国家,学位和教职。这些编辑委员会成员的h指数和其他文献计量指标是使用Web of Science(WoS)和Google Scholar(GS)数据库获得的。非参数统计用于分析h指数值的差异,并使用回归模型评估编委会成员的h指数预测其期刊影响因子(IF)的能力。结果:共有422名编委会成员评估。使用GS的所有编辑者的h指数中位数为20(四分位间距[IQR],19),使用WoS的中位h指数为15(IQR,15)。 GS h指数值比WoS高1.19倍,这些值之间具有显着相关性(r2 = 0.88,P = .0001)。具有博士学位的编委会成员的h指数显着高于没有博士学位的编者(GS,P = .0007; WoS,P = .0002),正式教授的h指数高于副教授和助理教授(GS,P =。 0001; WoS,P = .0001)。总体而言,截至2014年,各期刊的编委会成员的GS(P <.0001)和WoS(P <.0001)h指数的分布存在显着差异。 GS h指数(β系数,0.01228; 95%CI,0.01035-0.01423; P <.0001)以及WoS h指数(β系数,0.01507; 95%CI,0.01265-0.01749; P <。编辑委员会成员的0001)是其期刊2014年IF的重要预测因子。结论:顶级运动医学期刊编辑委员会成员的h指数是其各自期刊IF的重要预测因子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号