首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Social Sciences >A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Universal Design for Learning: Implementation and Effectiveness of Universal Design in Education for Students with and without Disabilities at the Postsecondary Level
【24h】

A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Universal Design for Learning: Implementation and Effectiveness of Universal Design in Education for Students with and without Disabilities at the Postsecondary Level

机译:对以经验为基础的学习通用设计的系统评价:通用设计在高等教育中对有残疾和无残疾学生的实施和效果

获取原文
       

摘要

This systematic review explored methods of UDL implementation for postsecondary students with and without disabilities and the degree to which these methods are effective. The authors examined 17 empirically based studies published across 12 journals focused on the application of UDL principles. The studies were analyzed with regard to 1) participant information, 2) courses and delivery mode, 3) independent and dependent variables, 4) implementation strategies, and 5) effectiveness of implementation. The analysis revealed that 15 of the studies reported effective outcomes, one study resulted in blended effects, and one did not discuss implementation. Two studies used a blended delivery mode for special education courses, and four studies used online delivery modes for a teacher education course and three professional development programs. Other studies used face-to-face instruction for teacher education, general courses, and workshops. The most common independent variables were UDL principle-based course design and implementation, followed by hands-on activities, training of instructors, peer-led team learning, and a collaborative professional development model. The dependent variables included course evaluation, learning outcomes, such as revision of lesson plans and technology use, and level of confidence or acquisition of knowledge about UDL and disabilities. Finally, multiple instructional strategies focusing on the UDL principles were utilized, to include web-based computer-mediated communication, web-based class management systems, interactions with technology and other participants, and learning community. Overall, the findings revealed promising learning outcomes as supported by the existing literature regarding the effectiveness and practicality of UDL for students with and without disabilities at the postsecondary level.
机译:该系统评价探讨了针对有残疾和无残疾的大专生实施UDL的方法,以及这些方法的有效程度。作者检查了在12份期刊上发表的17项基于经验的研究,这些研究的重点是UDL原理的应用。分析了以下方面的研究:1)参与者信息,2)课程和授课方式,3)自变量和因变量,4)实施策略以及5)实施的有效性。分析显示,有15项研究报告了有效的结果,一项研究产生了混合效应,而一项研究没有讨论实施。两项研究使用特殊教育课程的混合授课模式,四项研究使用教师教育课程和三种专业发展计划的在线交付模式。其他研究使用面对面的指导进行教师教育,普通课程和讲习班。最常见的独立变量是基于UDL原理的课程设计和实施,然后是动手活动,讲师培训,同行领导的团队学习和协作式专业发展模型。因变量包括课程评估,学习成果(例如修订课程计划和技术使用)以及对UDL和残疾的信心或获得知识的水平。最后,利用了针对UDL原理的多种教学策略,包括基于Web的计算机介导的交流,基于Web的班级管理系统,与技术和其他参与者的交互以及学习社区。总体而言,研究结果显示,在现有的有关UDL对高中和无残障学生的有效性和实用性的文献支持下,学习成果令人鼓舞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号