首页> 外文期刊>Orphanet journal of rare diseases >Clinical characteristics of patients with spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 3 and 6 in the US; a prospective observational study
【24h】

Clinical characteristics of patients with spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 3 and 6 in the US; a prospective observational study

机译:在美国,脊髓小脑性共济失调1、2、3和6患者的临床特征;前瞻性观察研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background All spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are rare diseases. SCA1, 2, 3 and 6 are the four most common SCAs, all caused by expanded polyglutamine-coding CAG repeats. Their pathomechanisms are becoming increasingly clear and well-designed clinical trials will be needed. Methods To characterize the clinical manifestations of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) 1, 2, 3 and 6 and their natural histories in the United States (US), we conducted a prospective multicenter study utilized a protocol identical to the European consortium study, using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score as the primary outcome, with follow-ups every 6 months up to 2 years. Results We enrolled 345 patients (60 SCA1, 75 SCA2, 138 SCA3 and 72 SCA6) at 12 US centers. SCA6 patients had a significantly later onset, and SCA2 patients showed greater upper-body ataxia than patients with the remaining SCAs. The annual increase of SARA score was greater in SCA1 patients (mean?±?SE: 1.61?±?0.41) than in SCA2 (0.71?±?0.31), SCA3 (0.65?±?0.24) and SCA6 (0.87?±?0.28) patients (p?=?0.049). The functional stage also worsened faster in SCA1 than in SCA2, 3 and 6 (p?=?0.002). Conclusions The proportions of different SCA patients in US differ from those in the European consortium study, but as in the European patients, SCA1 progress faster than those with SCA2, 3 and 6. Later onset in SCA6 and greater upper body ataxia in SCA2 were noted. We conclude that progression rates of these SCAs were comparable between US and Europe cohorts, suggesting the feasibility of international collaborative clinical studies.
机译:背景所有脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)都是罕见的疾病。 SCA1、2、3和6是四种最常见的SCA,均由扩展的聚谷氨酰胺编码CAG重复序列引起。他们的致病机理越来越明确,需要精心设计的临床试验。方法为了描述美国(美国)脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)1、2、3和6的临床表现及其自然史,我们使用Scale进行了一项与欧洲财团研究相同的方案,进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究。评估共济失调(SARA)评分为主要结果,每6个月进行随访,最多2年。结果我们在美国12个中心招募了345例患者(60 SCA1、75 SCA2、138 SCA3和72 SCA6)。 SCA6患者的发病明显较晚,并且SCA2患者的上身共济失调比其余SCAs的患者更大。 SCA1患者的SARA评分的年度增加幅度更大(平均SE:1.61±±0.41),而SCA2患者(0.71±±0.31),SCA3(0.65±±0.24)和SCA6(0.87±±0.43)更高。 0.28)个患者(p?=?0.049)。在SCA1中,功能阶段恶化的速度也比在SCA2、3和6中恶化(p≥0.002)。结论美国不同SCA患者的比例与欧洲财团研究的比例不同,但与欧洲患者一样,SCA1的进展快于SCA2、3和6的患者。SCA6起病较晚,SCA2发生上身共济失调的比例更高。我们得出的结论是,这些SCA的进展率在美国和欧洲队列之间是可比的,这表明了国际合作临床研究的可行性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号