首页> 外文期刊>Open access Emergency Medicine >Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
【24h】

Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department

机译:在急诊室使用副业脑震荡测试

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of death and disability in the United States. Many patients with TBI are initially treated in the emergency department (ED), but there is no evidence-based method of detecting or grading TBI in patients who have normal structural neuroimaging. This study aims to evaluate the validity of two common sideline concussion tests. The Concussion Symptom Severity Score (CSSS) and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) tests are well-validated sideline tests for concussion, but have not been validated in the setting of non-sport-related concussion, in settings other than the sideline or athletic training room or in moderate or severe TBI. Patients and methods: One hundred forty-eight subjects who had sustained a TBI within the previous 72 hours and 53 healthy control subjects were enrolled. CSSS and mBESS were administered. Clinical outcomes were followed up prospectively. Results: The CSSS was collected in 147 TBI subjects but only 51 TBI subjects were able to complete the mBESS. The CSSS was collected for all 53 control subjects, and the mBESS was completed for 51 control subjects. The mean CSSS for TBI and control subjects was 32.25 and 2.70, respectively ( P 0.001). The average mBESS for TBI and control subjects was 7.43 and 7.20, respectively ( P = 0.82). CSSS greater than 5.17 was 93.43% sensitive and 69.84% specific for TBI. Conclusion: The mBESS is poorly tolerated and, among those who can complete the test, not sensitive to TBI in the ED. The CSSS is both sensitive to TBI and well tolerated.
机译:目的:脑外伤(TBI)在美国是导致死亡和残疾的重要原因。许多TBI患者最初是在急诊科接受治疗的,但对于结构神经影像正常的患者,尚无基于证据的TBI检测或分级方法。这项研究旨在评估两个常见的副业脑震荡测试的有效性。脑震荡症状严重程度评分(CSSS)和修改后的平衡误差评分系统(mBESS)测试是针对脑震荡的经过充分验证的边线测试,但尚未在与运动无关的脑震荡,除边线以外的其他设置中进行验证运动训练室或中度或重度TBI。患者和方法:招募了前72小时内持续进行TBI的148位受试者和53位健康对照受试者。管理CSSS和mBESS。对临床结果进行前瞻性随访。结果:CSSS收集了147名TBI受试者,但只有51名TBI受试者能够完成mBESS。收集了所有53名对照受试者的CSSS,并为51名对照受试者完成了mBESS。 TBI和对照组受试者的平均CSSS分别为32.25和2.70(P <0.001)。 TBI和对照受试者的平均mBESS分别为7.43和7.20(P = 0.82)。大于5.17的CSSS对TBI的敏感性为93.43%,特异性为69.84%。结论:mBESS的耐受性差,并且在可以完成测试的患者中,对ED中的TBI不敏感。 CSSS对TBI敏感且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号