首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Statistics >Comparison of Methods of Estimating Missing Values in Time Series
【24h】

Comparison of Methods of Estimating Missing Values in Time Series

机译:时间序列缺失值估计方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper proposes new methods of estimating missing values in time series data while comparing them with existing methods. The new methods are based on the row, column and overall averages of time series data arranged in a Buys-Ballot table with m rows and s columns. The methods assume that style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">1 style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">) only one value is missing at a time, style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">2 style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">) the trending curve may be linear, quadratic or exponential and style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">3 style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">) the decomposition method is either Additive or Multiplicative. The performances of the methods are assessed by comparing accuracy measures (MAE, MAPE and RMSE) computed from the deviations of estimates of the missing values from the actual values used in simulation. Results show that, under the stated assumptions, estimates from the new method based on full decomposition of a series is the best (in terms of the accuracy measures) when compared with other two new and the existing methods.
机译:本文提出了一种在与现有方法进行比较的同时估计时间序列数据中缺失值的新方法。新方法基于行,列和时间序列数据的总体平均值,该时间序列数据排列在具有m行和s列的Buys-Ballot表中。这些方法假定 style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> style =“ font-family:Verdana;” > 1 style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> ;“>)一次只丢失一个值, style =” font-family:Verdana;“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“ > style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> 2 style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> style =“ font-family:Verdana ;“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“>)趋势曲线可能是线性,二次方或指数曲线,并且 style =” font-family:Verdana ;“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“> 3 style =” font-family :Verdana;“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“>),分解方法是加法或乘法。通过比较准确性度量(MAE,MAPE和RMSE)评估方法的性能,该准确性度量是根据缺失值的估计值与模拟中使用的实际值的偏差计算得出的。结果表明,在陈述的假设下,与其他两种新方法和现有方法相比,基于序列完全分解的新方法的估计值是最佳的(就准确性度量而言)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号