首页> 外文期刊>Online Journal of Health Ethics >Right or Duty: A Kantian Argument for Universal Healthcare
【24h】

Right or Duty: A Kantian Argument for Universal Healthcare

机译:权利还是义务:全民医疗保健的康德式论点

获取原文
           

摘要

Much of the political rhetoric about healthcare in the United States is couched in terms of healthcare as a right or entitlement. Healthcare as a right, like all welfare rights, carries with it the obligation to pay for it. This paper proposes that healthcare be considered, not a right, but rather a duty within the framework of a Kantian approach to ethics. The categorical imperatives of rational beings include the duties of self-preservation and self-development. As a precondition for these duties, health is essentially bound up with the nature and duties of physical, rational beings. The complexity of healthcare ensures that virtually all persons will need the services of others, and the expense of healthcare can exceed the resources even of those who are insured. Therefore, a just society has a moral duty to ensure access to healthcare to all of its members.
机译:在美国,有关医疗保健的许多政治言论都是以医疗保健作为权利或应享权利来表达的。与所有福利权利一样,医疗保健权利也承担着为其付款的义务。本文提出,在康德伦理学方法框架内,不应将医疗视为一项权利,而应将其视为一项责任。理性存在的绝对必要性包括自我保护和自我发展的职责。作为执行这些职责的先决条件,健康本质上是与肉体理性存在的性质和职责联系在一起的。医疗保健的复杂性确保了几乎所有人都需要他人的服务,而且医疗保健的费用甚至可能超过被保险人的资源。因此,一个公正的社会有道德义务确保所有成员获得医疗保健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号