首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Nursing >Wanting a Life in Decency!—A Qualitative Study from Experienced Electric Wheelchairs Users’ perspective
【24h】

Wanting a Life in Decency!—A Qualitative Study from Experienced Electric Wheelchairs Users’ perspective

机译:希望生活得体!从经验丰富的电动轮椅使用者的角度进行定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The functionality and the safety of the electric wheelchairs were essential for users’ everyday life. Some evidence indicated that the wheelchair Per Se highly influenced users’ occupational life, their personal identity and social life; further, the wheelchair became an extension of the body and more than a technical device. Besides, there was still both environmental and self-efficacy or/and mental health factors obstacles for full social participation. Even so, there was to some extent stigma related to being a wheelchair user. There was a need to reflect users’ perspective on being depended on electric wheelchair. The aim, accordingly, was to describe and to get a deeper insight into electric wheelchairs users’ perspective and experiences of utilizing this device; a qualitative design with an inductive approach was used. Method: Qualitative latent and interpretative content analysis [ 1 ] [ 2 ] was used after repeated face-to-face semi-structured interviews with three experienced Swedish electric wheelchair users during the autumn 2017. Findings: The findings showed a high degree of dependability of the assistants that supported the users, and of the quality of that working relationship. The findings were formulated, abstracted and interpreted in several steps. It showed one theme of meaning: “Living in a space shifting between potential violation of or respect for human dignity”. Conclusion: The study showed that electric wheelchair users were relatively content with their lives as well as with their devices in turns of mobility and accessibility, but the meaning of their narrations showed a life at constant risk of having the respect of human rights and human respect violated. Besides, the importance of having access to good and high quality devices, good staffing, and environmental support, all in concordance with human rights, the clinical and practical implications of this study narrows down to a question of encountering the other person as a whole and worthy individual.
机译:背景:电动轮椅的功能和安全性对于用户的日常生活至关重要。一些证据表明,轮椅Per Se极大地影响了使用者的职业生活,他们的个人身份和社交生活。此外,轮椅已成为人体的延伸,而不仅仅是一种技术装置。此外,充分的社会参与仍然存在环境和自我效能或/和心理健康因素的障碍。即使这样,在一定程度上还是与轮椅使用者有关的污名。有必要反映用户对依靠电动轮椅的看法。因此,其目的是描述和深入了解电动轮椅使用者使用该装置的观点和经验。使用归纳法进行定性设计。方法:在2017年秋季对三位瑞典电动轮椅使用者进行了面对面的半结构式访谈后,使用了定性的潜在性和解释性内容分析法[1] [2]。支持用户的助手以及这种工作关系的质量。研究结果是通过几个步骤来制定,抽象和解释的。它显示了一个意义主题:“生活在潜在的侵​​犯或尊重人的尊严之间的空间中”。结论:研究表明,电动轮椅使用者对他们的生活以及对他们的设备的满意度相对较高,但移动性和可及性却有所不同,但其叙述的含义表明,生命始终受到尊重人权和尊重的风险。违反了。此外,获得所有优质,高质量的设备,良好的人员配备和环境支持的重要性,都与人权相一致,这项研究的临床和实践意义将其范围缩小为与另一个人相遇的问题,值得个人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号