首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine >Development and Validation of an Objective Risk Scoring System for Assessing the Likelihood of Virus Introduction in Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus-Free Sow Farms in the US
【24h】

Development and Validation of an Objective Risk Scoring System for Assessing the Likelihood of Virus Introduction in Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus-Free Sow Farms in the US

机译:开发和验证客观的风险评分系统,以评估美国无猪繁殖和呼吸综合征无病毒母猪场中病毒引入的可能性

获取原文
           

摘要

The lack of validated tools to predict how long sow farms will remain PRRS virus-free following successful elimination of the virus has deterred veterinarians and producers from attempting to eliminate the PRRS virus from sow farms. The aim of this study was to use the database of PRRS Risk Assessments for the Breeding Herd in PADRAP to develop and validate an objective risk scoring system for predicting the likelihood of virus introduction in PRRS virus-free sow farms in the US. To overcome the challenges of dealing with a large number of variables, group lasso for logistic regression (GLLR) was applied to a retrospective dataset of PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd surveys completed for 704 farms to develop the risk scoring system. The validity of the GLLR risk scoring system was then evaluated by testing its predictive ability on a dataset from a long-term prospective study of 196 sow farms to assess risk factors associated with how long PRRS virus-free sow farms remained PRRS virus-free. Receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curves were estimated to compare the performance of the GLLR risk scoring system to the risk scoring system based on expert opinion (EO), currently used in the PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd, for predicting whether herds remained PRRS virus-free for 130 weeks. The GLLR risk scoring system (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67 - 0.84) performed significantly better than the EO risk scoring system (AUC, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27 - 0.46) for predicting whether to sow farms in the prospective study survived for 130 weeks (p 0.001). Dividing farms into 3 risk groups (low, medium and high) using a low and high cutoff values for the GLLR risk score was informative as the differences in the KM survival curves for the 3 groups were both clinically meaningful and statistically significant. The GLLR risk scoring system used in conjunction with the PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd survey delivered through PADRAP appears to have the potential to help veterinarians predict the likelihood of virus introduction in PRRS virus-free sow farms in the US.
机译:缺乏有效的工具来预测成功消除病毒后母猪场将保持无PRRS病毒多久,这阻碍了兽医和生产者尝试从母猪场消除PRRS病毒。这项研究的目的是使用针对PADRAP的繁殖群PRRS风险评估的数据库来开发和验证客观的风险评分系统,以预测美国PRRS无病毒母猪场中引入病毒的可能性。为了克服应对大量变量的挑战,将用于逻辑回归的套索法(GLLR)应用于PRRS风险评估的回顾性数据集,该数据集针对704个农场完成了育种群调查,以开发风险评分系统。然后通过对来自196个母猪场的长期前瞻性研究的数据集测试其预测能力,评估GLLR风险评分系统的有效性,以评估与PRRS无病毒母猪保持无PRRS病毒时间相关的风险因素。估计接收者操作员特征(ROC)曲线,以根据专家意见(EO)(目前在PRRS繁殖群风险评估中使用的专家意见(EO))来比较GLLR风险评分系统和风险评分系统的性能,以预测种群是否仍为PRRS 130周无病毒。 GLLR风险评分系统(AUC,0.76; 95%CI,0.67-0.84)在预测是否播种农场方面比EO风险评分系统(AUC,0.36; 95%CI,0.27-0.46)表现要好得多。前瞻性研究存活了130周(p 0.001)。使用低和高临界值的GLLR风险值将农场分为3个风险组(低,中和高),这是有益的,因为这3组KM生存曲线的差异具有临床意义和统计学意义。 GLLR风险评分系统与通过PADRAP进行的PRRS育种牛群风险评估结合使用,似乎有可能帮助兽医预测美国PRRS无病毒母猪场中引入病毒的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号