首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Applied Sciences >World Trade Logics and Measure of Global Inequality: Regional Pattern and Globalization Evolution between 2003-2012
【24h】

World Trade Logics and Measure of Global Inequality: Regional Pattern and Globalization Evolution between 2003-2012

机译:世界贸易逻辑与全球不平等程度的衡量:2003-2012年间的区域格局与全球化演变

获取原文
       

摘要

The economy is globalizing. But how are the different economic world regions performing regarding globalization of trade flows? Why are they performing differently? Globalization is not only the increase of international trade between certain preferential geographic areas of economy, but also the resulting increase of interweavement of trade flows between different geographical areas, independent of the amount of trade. This paper is a revised and expanded version of the paper entitled “World Trade and Associated Systems Risk of Global Inequality: Empiric Study of Globalization Evolution between 2003-2011 and Regional Pattern Analysis” presented at International Conference on Applied Economics (ICOAE2013), Istanbul, 27-29 June, 2013. This paper analyzes the evolution of world trade flows between 2003-2012 and performs a cross-section analysis of the year 2012. The economic interweavement will be measured by an inequality risk metric applied to the supply-demand matrix. This risk indicator is based on the concept of statistical entropy resulting in an inequality risk measure, giving an indication for the degree of economic globalization and the evolution of globalization in different geographical regions. In addition, it analyses the governing rational of globalization evolution. The result of this research shows that economic trade flows are globalizing, but with clear different regional patterns, not only between globalizing and de-globalizing regions, but also within the globalizing and de-globalizing regions itself. The emerging economies such as China or the Middle East are globalizing whereas mature economies such as North America and Europe are de-globalizing, confirming for globalization of the inverse Kuznets evolution. The different patterns between the different economic world regions can be explained by using the Globalization Type’s Model as well as the Central Theorem of Globalization.
机译:经济正在全球化。但是不同的经济世界地区在贸易流全球化方面表现如何呢?他们为什么表现不同?全球化不仅是某些优惠经济地理区域之间国际贸易的增加,而且是不同地理区域之间贸易流量相互交织的增加,而与贸易量无关。本文是在伊斯坦布尔国际应用经济会议(ICOAE2013)上发表的题为“世界贸易和相关系统的全球不平等风险:2003-2011年全球化演变与区域模式分析的经验研究”的论文的修订和扩展版本。 2013年6月27日至29日。本文分析了2003年至2012年世界贸易流量的演变,并对2012年进行了横断面分析。经济交织将通过应用于供求矩阵的不平等风险度量来衡量。 。该风险指标基于统计熵的概念,导致不平等风险测度,为经济全球化程度和不同地理区域全球化的发展提供了指示。此外,它分析了全球化演变的治理理性。这项研究的结果表明,经济贸易流正在全球化,但是具有明显不同的区域模式,不仅在全球化和去全球化的区域之间,而且也在全球化和去全球化的区域内部。中国或中东等新兴经济体正在全球化,而北美和欧洲等成熟经济体正在去全球化,这证实了库兹涅茨逆发展的全球化趋势。可以使用全球化类型的模型以及全球化的中心定理来解释不同经济世界区域之间的不同模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号