首页> 外文期刊>Open Forum Infectious Diseases >Universal Influenza Vaccination Among Healthcare Personnel: Yes We Should
【24h】

Universal Influenza Vaccination Among Healthcare Personnel: Yes We Should

机译:医护人员中的普遍流感疫苗:是的,我们应该

获取原文
           

摘要

At the start of this century, despite tremendous efforts to promote healthcare personnel (HCP) influenza vaccination by government agencies, professional societies, and visible vaccine champions, the HCP influenza vaccination rate remained unacceptably low (~45%). Subsequently, the perception of HCP influenza immunization evolved from an employee health benefit to an important measure of a healthcare facility’s quality and patient safety program, moving an increasing number of facilities to mandate influenza vaccination. The rationale for these policies centers upon several core concepts: (1) the role HCP play in healthcare-associated pathogen transmission, (2) the lack of clear symptoms of influenza in many HCP, and (3) the vulnerability of patients to complications from influenza. Since 2005, when Virginia Mason Medical Center required influenza immunization as a condition of employment [1], leading to vaccination rates of 98.9%, more institutions have implemented similar programs [2–7], including all Veteran’s Administration hospitals in 2017 [8]. Based on an annual survey of HCP conducted by the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, the percentage of HCP working under an employer vaccination requirement increased from 20.9% during the 2011–2012 influenza season to 44.1% during the 2017–2018 season [9]. Mandatory programs do have some implementation differences, including mask use for unvaccinated HCP during the influenza season, allowed exemptions (eg, only medical vs allowance for personal belief exemption), and consequences for noncompliance. It is important to note that although a few HCP have had their employment terminated due to vaccine refusal, the actual reported number of HCP dismissed is very small compared with the thousands of HCP encompassed by these policies.
机译:在本世纪初,尽管政府机构,专业协会和有名的疫苗拥护者为促进医护人员(HCP)流感疫苗的接种做出了巨大努力,但HCP流感疫苗的接种率仍然低得令人无法接受(〜45%)。随后,对HCP流感疫苗的认识已从员工的健康福利演变为衡量医疗机构质量和患者安全计划的一项重要指标,从而使越来越多的机构开始强制接种流感疫苗。这些政策的基本原理基于几个核心概念:(1)HCP在与医疗相关的病原体传播中发挥的作用;(2)许多HCP中缺乏明显的流感症状;(3)患者易患并发症流感。自2005年以来,弗吉尼亚梅森医疗中心要求将流感疫苗作为一种就业条件[1],导致疫苗接种率为98.9%,更多的机构已经实施了类似的计划[2-7],包括2017年所有退伍军人管理局的医院[8] 。根据疾病预防控制中心对HCP的年度调查,根据雇主疫苗接种要求工作的HCP百分比从2011-2012年流感季节的20.9%增加到2017-2018年流感季节的44.1%[9] 。强制性计划的确存在一些实施差异,包括在流感季节未接种HCP时使用口罩,允许的豁免(例如,医疗与个人信仰豁免的许可)以及不遵守规定的后果。重要的是要注意,尽管少数HCP因拒绝接种疫苗而终止了工作,但与这些政策所涵盖的数千HCP相比,实际报告的HCP被解雇的人数非常少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号