...
首页> 外文期刊>OncoTargets and therapy >Comparison of clinical features, molecular alterations, and prognosis in morphological subgroups of lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma
【24h】

Comparison of clinical features, molecular alterations, and prognosis in morphological subgroups of lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma

机译:肺浸润性黏液腺癌形态学亚型的临床特征,分子改变和预后的比较

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: We performed this analysis to distinguish the differences in two subtypes of lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) with different kinds of morphological performances, in clinicopathological and molecular features, as well as prognosis. Methods: On the basis of morphological performance, we divided lung IMAs into two subgroups, mucus-in-cell adenocarcinoma (MICA) and mucus-out-of-cell adenocarcinoma (MOCA). We investigated differences in clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and a spectrum of well-identified driver-gene mutations, including EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, ALK, ROS1, and RET, between the two subgroups. Results: Of 1,699 lung adenocarcinomas, 148 were identified as IMAs (97 MICAs and 51 MOCAs). The MICA patient group had significantly better RFS than did the MOCA group (39.4 months versus 33.0 months, respectively, log rank P=0.020) and significantly better OS (54.2 months versus 45.1 months, log rank P=0.034). There were no differences in RFS and OS between those with IMAs and those with mucus-negative adenocarcinomas. The frequency of the EGFR gene mutation was significantly higher in MOCAs than in MICAs (P<0.001). In contrast, the KRAS gene had a significantly higher mutational frequency in MICAs (P=0.01). MOCAs also had a significantly higher incidence of lymph-node metastasis (P<0.05). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study represents the first comparison of clinical features, molecular alterations, and prognosis in morphological subgroups of lung IMAs. Clinical and pathological features in conjunction with molecular data indicate that IMA should be divided into different subgroups.
机译:目的:我们进行了这项分析,以区分具有不同形态学表现,临床病理和分子特征以及预后的两种类型的肺浸润性黏液腺癌(IMA)的差异。方法:根据形态学表现,我们将肺IMA分为两个亚组:粘液细胞内腺癌(MICA)和粘液细胞外腺癌(MOCA)。我们调查了临床病理特征,无复发生存期(RFS),总生存期(OS)以及一系列公认的驱动基因突变(包括EGFR,KRAS,HER2,BRAF,ALK,ROS1和RET)之间的差异这两个子组。结果:在1699例肺腺癌中,有148例被确定为IMA(97例MICA和51例MOCA)。 MICA患者组的RFS显着优于MOCA组(分别为39.4个月对33.0个月,对数秩P = 0.020)和OS显着更好(54.2个月对45.1个月,对数秩P = 0.034)。 IMA患者和粘液阴性腺癌患者的RFS和OS没有差异。在MOCA中,EGFR基因突变的频率显着高于在MICA中(P <0.001)。相比之下,KRAS基因在MICAs中具有明显更高的突变频率(P = 0.01)。 MOCAs淋巴结转移的发生率也明显更高(P <0.05)。结论:据我们所知,这项研究代表了肺IMAs形态亚组的临床特征,分子改变和预后的首次比较。临床和病理学特征以及分子数据表明,IMA应该分为不同的亚组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号