首页> 外文期刊>OncoTargets and therapy >Comparison of FOLFOX and DOF regimens as first-line treatment in East Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer
【24h】

Comparison of FOLFOX and DOF regimens as first-line treatment in East Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer

机译:东亚晚期胃癌患者采用FOLFOX和DOF方案作为一线治疗的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Our study retrospectively assesses the safety and efficacy of the FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) versus DOF (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil) regimens in untreated locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients and methods: A total of 108 patients underwent DOF (N=58) and FOLFOX (N=50) regimens. The end points were overall response rate (ORR), survival, and toxicity. Kaplan–Meier curve was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and Cox regression for multivariate analysis. Results: The ORRs were 50% for DOF and 30% for FOLFOX groups ( P <0.05), and disease control rates were 91.4% and 72%, respectively. The median PFS and OS in DOF group were significantly better than FOLFOX group (8.2 versus 6.4 months, P <0.05; 16.3 versus 11.2?months, P <0.001). Both groups showed acceptable toxicity; all grades and grade 3–4 toxicity had no significant differences ( P =0.071; P =0.247). However, the incidence of grade?3–4 peripheral neuropathy was significantly higher in DOF group (10.3% versus 2%, P <0.05). In the subgroup analysis for elderly AGC patients (≥65 years), administration of DOF also resulted in a superior PFS (8.5 versus 5.9 months; P =0.038) and OS (15.3 versus 9.8 months; P =0.004) compared with FOLFOX. However, DOF regimen was associated with more neutropenia (67% versus 30%; P <0.05), thrombocytopenia (61% versus 52%; P <0.05), and peripheral neuropathy (49% versus 22%; P <0.05). Conclusion: DOF regimen was more effective than FOLFOX for AGC, both in younger and older patients. The adverse effects of the two regimens were manageable. The combination of docetaxel/oxaliplatin/fluorouracil was active and well tolerated in AGC patients and deserves further evaluation. However, for elderly patients with AGC, the DOF regimen was associated with worse toxicities; therefore, the FOLFOX regimen might be a more suitable option.
机译:背景:我们的研究回顾了FOLFOX(奥沙利铂,氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙)与DOF(多西他赛,奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶)方案在未经治疗的局部晚期胃癌(AGC)中的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:共有108例患者接受了DOF(N = 58)和FOLFOX(N = 50)方案。终点是总体缓解率(ORR),生存率和毒性。 Kaplan–Meier曲线用于估计总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)以及Cox回归以进行多变量分析。结果:DOF组的ORR为50%,FOLFOX组的ORR为30%(P <0.05),疾病控制率分别为91.4%和72%。 DOF组的中位PFS和OS明显优于FOLFOX组(8.2个月对6.4个月,P <0.05; 16.3个月对11.2个月,P <0.001)。两组均显示可接受的毒性。所有等级和3–4级毒性均无显着差异(P = 0.071; P = 0.247)。但是,DOF组3-4级周围神经病变的发生率明显更高(10.3%对2%,P <0.05)。在老年AGC患者(≥65岁)的亚组分析中,与FOLFOX相比,DOF的PFS(8.5比5.9个月; P = 0.038)和OS(15.3比9.8个月; P = 0.004)更好。但是,DOF方案与更多的中性粒细胞减少症(67%比30%; P <0.05),血小板减少症(61%比52%; P <0.05)和周围神经病变(49%比22%; P <0.05)相关。结论:对于年轻和老年患者,对于AGC,DOF方案比FOLFOX更有效。两种方案的不良反应是可以控制的。多西他赛/奥沙利铂/氟尿嘧啶的组合在AGC患者中很活跃且耐受性良好,值得进一步评估。然而,对于老年AGC患者,DOF方案与较差的毒性相关。因此,FOLFOX方案可能是更合适的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号