首页> 外文期刊>Roczniki Gleboznawcze >Soil grain size analysis by the dynamometer method – a comparison to the pipette and hydrometer method
【24h】

Soil grain size analysis by the dynamometer method – a comparison to the pipette and hydrometer method

机译:用测力计法分析土壤粒径–与移液器和比重计法比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of the presented work was to compare the results of grain size distribution measurement by an innovative dynamometer method, developed by the authors, with results obtained by the pipette and hydrometer methods. Repeatability of results obtained in the dynamometer method was also determined. The content of three fractions with equivalent diameters 0.002 mm, 0.002–0.063 mm and 0.063–2.0 mm was measured. The results were compared using ordinary linear regression and additionally in the repeatability analysis by RMA (reduced major axis regression). It was found that the proposed dynamometer method is characterized by good result repeatability with no systematic errors when compared with the pipette method. The RMSE (root mean square error) value when referring to the pipette method calculated for the three fractions considered in total was 4.9096 and was lower than the analogous for the hydrometer method, which amounted to 5.4577. Values of determination coefficients in the comparison of dynamometer method and pipette method are within the range of 0.9681–0.9951 for the different fractions. It was found that slightly larger differences in relation to the pipette method occurred for the fractions 0.002 mm and 0.002–0.063 mm, and smaller for the fraction 0.063–2.0 mm. Similarly, greater differences between repetitions in the dynamometer method were observed for the fraction 0.002 mm, and smaller for the 0.063–2.0 mm fraction. Possible sources of errors in the dynamometer method were discussed, as were proposals for their reduction.
机译:本文工作的目的是比较作者开发的一种创新的测力计方法与通过移液器和比重计方法获得的结果进行粒度分布测量的结果。还确定了测力计方法获得的结果的可重复性。测量了当量直径<0.002 mm,0.002-0.063 mm和0.063-2.0 mm的三个馏分的含量。使用普通的线性回归对结果进行了比较,此外还通过RMA(简化的主轴回归)进行了可重复性分析。结果发现,与移液管法相比,所提出的测功机方法具有结果重复性好,无系统误差的特点。当参考针对总共考虑的三个馏分计算出的移液器方法时,RMSE(均方根误差)值为4.9096,低于比重计法的类似值5.4577。测力计法和移液器法的比较中,不同分数的测定系数值在0.9681-0.9951之间。结果发现,相对于移液器方法,小于0.002 mm和0.002-0.063 mm的部分差异更大,而小于0.063-2.0 mm的部分则较小。同样,测力计方法中重复次数之间的差异较大,对于小于0.002 mm的分数,对于0.063-2.0 mm的分数则较小。讨论了测功机方法中可能的误差来源,以及减少误差的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号