首页> 外文期刊>Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions >THE ROLE OF OPERATING CASH FLOW IN CREDIT RATING: INVESTMENT-GRADE FIRMS VS. SPECULATIVEGRADE FIRMS
【24h】

THE ROLE OF OPERATING CASH FLOW IN CREDIT RATING: INVESTMENT-GRADE FIRMS VS. SPECULATIVEGRADE FIRMS

机译:经营现金流量在信贷评级中的作用:投资级企业对VS。专业级企业

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite Standard and Poor’s long-standing claim that cash flow is a critical aspect of its rating decisions, the credit rating literature has failed to document a significant relation between credit rating and cash flow measures. A possible explanation of this discrepancy is that the rating agency weighs operating cash flow differently between investment-grade and speculative-grade issuers. Performing an ordered probit analysis of a panel of firms from 1989 to 2006, we find operating cash flow is positively associated with credit ratings for speculative-grade issuers, but not for investment-grade issuers. In contrast, accrual-based earnings are found to be positively associated with credit ratings, but only for investment-grade firms. Our study thus solves a discrepancy between industry documents and the academic literature.
机译:尽管标准普尔(Standard and Poor)长期以来一直宣称现金流量是其评级决策的关键方面,但信用评级文献仍未能证明信用评级与现金流量指标之间的重要关系。这种差异的一种可能解释是,评级机构对投资级和投机级发行人之间的经营现金流量的加权不同。对1989年至2006年的一组公司进行有序的概率分析,我们发现投机级发行人的经营现金流量与信用评级呈正相关,而投资级发行人的经营现金流量与信用评级呈正相关。相比之下,应计制收益与信用评级呈正相关,但仅适用于投资级公司。因此,我们的研究解决了行业文献与学术文献之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号