首页> 外文期刊>RMD Open >Self-reported quality care for knee osteoarthritis: comparisons across Denmark, Norway, Portugal and the UK
【24h】

Self-reported quality care for knee osteoarthritis: comparisons across Denmark, Norway, Portugal and the UK

机译:自我报告的膝盖骨关节炎优质护理服务:丹麦,挪威,葡萄牙和英国的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives To assess and compare patient perceived quality of osteoarthritis (OA) management in primary healthcare in Denmark, Norway, Portugal and the UK. Methods Participants consulting with clinical signs and symptoms of knee OA were identified in 30 general practices and invited to complete a cross-sectional survey including quality indicators (QI) for OA care. A QI was considered as eligible if the participant had checked ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, and as achieved if the participant had checked ‘Yes’ to the indicator. The median percentage (with IQR and range) of eligible QIs achieved by country was determined and compared in negative binominal regression analysis. Achievement of individual QIs by country was determined and compared using logistic regression analyses. Results A total of 354 participants self-reported QI achievement. The median percentage of eligible QIs achieved (checked ‘Yes’) was 48% (IQR 28%, 64%; range 0–100%) for the total sample with relatively similar medians across three of four countries. Achievement rates on individual QIs showed a large variation ranging from 11% (referral to services for losing weight) to 67% (information about the importance of exercise) with significant differences in achievement rates between the countries. Conclusions The results indicated a potential for improvement in OA care in all four countries, but for somewhat different aspects of OA care. By exploring these differences and comparing healthcare services, ideas may be generated on how the quality might be improved across nations. Larger studies are needed to confirm and further explore the findings.
机译:目的评估和比较丹麦,挪威,葡萄牙和英国的主要医疗机构中患者对骨关节炎(OA)管理的感知质量。方法在30种常规方法中,确定与膝OA相关的临床体征和症状进行咨询的参与者,并邀请他们完成包括OA护理质量指标(QI)在内的横断面调查。如果参与者选择了“是”或“否”,则认为QI是合格的;如果参与者对指标选中了“是”,则认为QI是合格的。确定了国家达到的合格QI的中位数百分比(包括IQR和范围),并在负二项式回归分析中进行了比较。确定了各个国家(地区)的QI数量,并使用逻辑回归分析进行了比较。结果共有354名参与者自我报告了QI成绩。在四个国家中,有三个国家的总样本中达到的合格QI的中位数百分比为48%(IQR为28%,64%;范围为0-100%)。各个QI的成就率差异很大,从11%(推荐给减肥服务)到67%(关于锻炼的重要性的信息),各国之间的成就率差异很大。结论结果表明,在所有四个国家,OA护理都有改善的潜力,但在OA护理的某些方面却有所不同。通过探讨这些差异并比较医疗保健服务,可以就如何提高各国的质量产生想法。需要更大的研究来确认和进一步探索发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号