首页> 外文期刊>Revista Sociedade & Natureza >Artisanal fishing, shrimp farming and mangroves: perspectives on the Federal Law no 12651/2012 and the use of “apicum” and “salgado” areas in Canguaretama/RN, Brazil
【24h】

Artisanal fishing, shrimp farming and mangroves: perspectives on the Federal Law no 12651/2012 and the use of “apicum” and “salgado” areas in Canguaretama/RN, Brazil

机译:手工捕鱼,虾类养殖和红树林:对巴西第12651/2012号联邦法律的看法以及巴西Canguaretama / RN的“ apicum”和“ salgado”地区的使用

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractThis paper presents considerations on the Federal Law no 12651/2012, better known as Brazil's new Forest Code, which granted the use of “apicum” (swamp in the Tupi language)” and “salgado” sectors (regions of mangrove) to shrimp farming. This code approved that 35% of these ecotones can be used for shrimp farming. Thus, this study aimed to look into the way these legislative updates have influenced or will influence the social, economic and environmental aspects of the shrimp farming activity in Rio Grande do Norte (RN), particularly in the municipality of Canguaretama. A quali-quantitative approach was used, with questionnaires and semi-structured interviews applied to the artisanal fishermen, shrimp farmers and to the State Environmental Agency. Artisanal fishermen understood that this legislative change degrades and unbalances the ecological environment, especially that there will be loss of territory and damage to their fishing resources, so they were against such change, the same opinion of the State Environmental Agency. On the other hand, shrimp farmers were in favor of the changes, claiming to be a legal incentive for their activity, contributing to the legalization of previously illegal enterprises, in addition to expanding their area of cultivation.. . . . .
机译:摘要本文提出了对第12651/2012号联邦法律的考虑,该法律被称为巴西的新《森林法》,该法授予在虾类养殖中使用“ apicum”(图皮语的沼泽)和“ salgado”部门(红树林地区) 。该法规批准将其中的35%过渡带用于虾类养殖。因此,本研究旨在调查这些立法更新对北里奥格兰德州(RN),特别是在Canguaretama市中虾类养殖活动的社会,经济和环境方面的影响或将影响的方式。使用定性定量方法,对手工渔民,虾农和国家环境局进行了问卷调查和半结构化访谈。手工渔民了解到,这种立法变化使生态环境恶化和失衡,特别是将失去领土并破坏其捕捞资源,因此,他们反对这种变化,这与国家环境局的观点相同。另一方面,对虾养殖者赞成这种变化,声称这是对虾生产活动的合法诱因,除了扩大养殖面积外,还促进了以前非法企业的合法化。 。 。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号