首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia >Temporal Processing and Dichotic Listening in bilingual and non-bilingual descendants
【24h】

Temporal Processing and Dichotic Listening in bilingual and non-bilingual descendants

机译:双语和非双语后代的时间处理和二分听

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyze the auditory behavior in Pitch(PPS) and Duration(DPS)Pattern Sequence tests and in the Dichotic Listening (Dichotic Digits Test/DDT) of familiar and unfamiliar words (Staggered Spondaic Words/SSW) in Japanese descendants that speak Japanese and Japanese descendants that do not speak Japanese, and to compare these findings with a group of non-Japanese descendants who have no contact with the Japanese language. METHOD: 60 High School graduates aged 17 to 40 years were evaluated. Subjects were divided into three groups: GJJ, Japanese descendants that speak Brazilian Portuguese and Japanese; GJP, Japanese descendants that speak Portuguese and do not speak Japanese; GBP non-oriental descendants that speak Brazilian Portuguese. All subjects filled in a questionnaire about their languages and musical abilities. Their ability in pattern-recognition tests was assessed by the PPS and DPS tests, their ability to recognize familiar words was tested by DDT and their ability to recognize unfamiliar words was tested by SSW. Results. GJJ and GJP showed higher performances than the group of Brazilians (GBP) in the PPS. RESULTS: show a statistically significant difference among the groups with a higher mean for the SSW results in GJJ compred to GJP and GBP. CONCLUSION:The results of SSW test seem to be influenced by bilingualism.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析日语中音高(PPS)和持续时间(DPS)模式序列测试以及熟悉和不熟悉的单词(交错的Spondaic单词/ SSW)的二分听(Dichotic Digits Test / DDT)中的听觉行为。会说日语的后代和不会说日语的日本后代,并将这些发现与一组与日语没有联系的非日本后代进行比较。方法:对60名年龄在17至40岁的高中毕业生进行了评估。受试者分为三类:GJJ,说巴西葡萄牙语和日语的日本后裔; GJP,说葡萄牙语但不说日语的日本后裔;会说巴西葡萄牙语的GBP非东方裔。所有受试者填写有关其语言和音乐能力的问卷。通过PPS和DPS测试评估了他们在模式识别测试中的能力,通过DDT测试了他们识别熟悉单词的能力,并且通过SSW测试了他们识别陌生单词的能力。结果。 GJJ和GJP在PPS中的表现要高于巴西人(GBP)。结果:GJJ换算为GJP和GBP的SSW结果均值具有较高的统计学差异。结论:SSW测试的结果似乎受双语影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号