...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia >Uso correto do cinto de seguran?a e dos dispositivos de restri??o infantil em automóveis de Goiania
【24h】

Uso correto do cinto de seguran?a e dos dispositivos de restri??o infantil em automóveis de Goiania

机译:正确使用戈亚尼亚汽车上的安全带和儿童约束装置

获取原文
           

摘要

ResumoObjetivo Fazer um estudo observacional, por meio de campanhas, sobre o uso dos dispositivos de restri??o infantil em automóveis de Goiania. Métodos Estudo transversal por amostra de conveniência conforme surgimento dos casos. Os dados foram coletados em uma tabela Excel, analisados de forma descritiva e estatística (SPSS 16.0), com o uso do qui‐quadrado, com p  0,05 como significativo. Resultados Em 2006, foram avaliados 410 automóveis, enquanto que em 2010 foram avaliados 544, nos quais cerca de 85% das pessoas usavam o cinto de forma correta nos dois períodos (p = 0,650). Em 2006, foram observados 273 passageiros no banco dianteiro e em 2010, 226. Usavam cinto de seguran?a 178 e 170, respectivamente, ou 65,2 e 75,22% (p = 0,001). Em 2006, cinco crian?as ocupavam o banco da frente sem o uso do cinto de seguran?a. Em 2010, esse número foi de 42 (p  0,001). Em 2010, foram observados 458 veículos que transportavam crian?as no banco traseiro, 214 de maneira correta, ou 46,72%. Em 2006, dos 410 veículos analisados, apenas 90 (21,95%) transportavam crian?as de maneira correta (p  0,001). Além disso, houve diferen?a entre as variáveis dentro do ano avaliado, no qual o transporte correto no banco da frente foi bem mais frequente do que o no banco de trás, nos dois anos (p  0,001). Carros transportavam de uma a quatro crian?as e as vans, de uma a nove crian?as. Em 2006 foi observada uma van que transportava crian?as de maneira irregular, enquanto que em 2010 todas estavam corretas. Conclus?o Na compara??o desses dois períodos, podemos avaliar que houve um início de mudan?a no comportamento do motorista goianiense no que tange à seguran?a no transporte de crian?as em automóveis, com melhoria de 25% (p  0,001). Grande parte disso decorreu da mudan?a de atitude da popula??o após as campanhas feitas, até pela mídia, e da obrigatoriedade da lei. AbstractObjective To conduct an observational study, by means of campaigns, regarding the use of child restraint devices in cars in Goiania. Methods This was a cross‐sectional study using a convenience sample built up as cases arose. The data were gathered into an Excel spreadsheet and were analyzed descriptively and statistically (SPSS 16.0), using chi‐square and taking p  0.05 as significant. Results In 2006, 410 cars were evaluated, and in 2010, 544 cars were evaluated. Around 85% of the occupants were using seat belts correctly at both times (p = 0.650). In 2006, it was observed that a total of 273 passengers were occupying the rear seats, while in 2010 there were 226. Among these, 178 and 170 were using seat belts, respectively, i.e. 65.2% and 75.22% (p = 0.001). In 2006, five children were occupying the front seat without using the seat belt, while in 2010, this number was 42 (p  0.001). In 2010, it was observed that 458 vehicles were transporting children on the rear seats, and this was being done correctly in 214 vehicles, i.e. 46.72%. In 2006, out of the 410 vehicles analyzed, only 90 of them (21.95%) were transporting children correctly (p  0.001). In addition, there was a difference in the variables within the year evaluated, in which transportation done correctly in the front seat was much more frequent than transportation done correctly in the rear seats, in both years (p  0.001). Cars transported one to four children, while vans transported one to nine children. In 2006, one van transporting children irregularly was observed, while in 2010 it was done correctly in all cases. Conclusion Comparing these two years (2006 and 2010) in which data were gathered, we can conclude that changes in behavior among drivers in Goiania have begun, with regard to safety when transporting children in vehicles, with an improvement of 25% (p  0.001). A large part of this has come through changes in knowledge among this segment of the population, through campaigns that have been carried out, including through the media, and because of legal obligations.
机译:摘要目的通过运动对戈亚尼亚的儿童约束装置的使用进行一项观察性研究。方法视情况使用方便样本进行横断面研究。数据收集在Excel表中,使用卡方检验进行描述性和统计学分析(SPSS 16.0),p <0.05为显着性。结果2006年,对410辆汽车进行了评估,而2010年,对544辆汽车进行了评估,其中两个阶段中约有85%的人正确使用了安全带(p = 0.650)。在2006年,有273名乘客坐在前排座位上,在2010年,有226名乘客。分别戴着安全带178和170,占安全带的比例为65.2和75.22%(p = 0.001)。 2006年,五个孩子坐在前排座位上,没有系安全带。在2010年,这一数字为42(p <0.001)。在2010年,观察到458辆将儿童带到后座的车辆,正确发现214辆,占46.72%。 2006年,在分析的410辆车中,只有90辆(21.95%)正确地运送了儿童(p <0.001)。此外,在所评估的一年中,两个变量之间存在差异,在这两个年份中,前排座椅的正确运输频率比后排座椅的正确运输频率要高得多(p <0.001)。汽车从一到四个孩子和面包车运输,从一到九个孩子。在2006年,发现一辆货车不定期地运送儿童,而在2010年,这一切都是正确的。结论在这两个时期的比较中,我们可以评估,Goianiense驾驶员在汽车儿童运输安全方面的行为已开始发生变化,改善了25%(p <0.001)。造成这种情况的主要原因是,在运动之后,甚至是通过媒体,人们的态度发生了变化,以及强制性法律的改变。摘要目的通过运动开展有关戈亚尼亚儿童约束装置在汽车上的使用的观察性研究。方法这是一项横断面研究,使用了根据情况建立的便利样本。将数据收集到Excel电子表格中,并进行描述性和统计性分析(SPSS 16.0),使用卡方和以p <0.05为显着性。结果2006年评估了410辆汽车,2010年评估了544辆汽车。在这两次中,约有85%的乘员正确使用了安全带(p = 0.650)。在2006年,观察到总共有273名乘客坐在后排座位上,而在2010年有226名乘客在座位上,分别有178和170个使用安全带,分别占65.2%和75.22%(p = 0.001)。 2006年,有五个孩子不使用安全带就坐在前排座位上,而在2010年,这个数字是42(p <0.001)。在2010年,据观察有458辆车将儿童运送到后排座位上,而这在214辆车中正确完成,即46.72%。 2006年,在分析的410辆车中,只有90辆(21.95%)正确地运送了儿童(p <0.001)。此外,在所评估的一年中,变量之间存在差异,在这两个年份中,前排座椅正确执行的运输比后排座椅正确执行的运输要频繁得多(p <0.001)。小汽车运送1至4个孩子,货车则运送1至9个孩子。在2006年,观察到一辆货车不定期地运送儿童,而在2010年,在所有情况下都正确地进行了运送。结论与收集数据的这两年(2006年和2010年)相比,我们可以得出结论,就运送儿童的安全性而言,戈亚尼亚驾驶员的行为已开始发生变化,改善了25%(p <0.001)。 )。其中很大一部分是由于这部分人口的知识变化,通过包括媒体在内的各种运动以及法律义务引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号