首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia >Risk of injury to vascular-nerve bundle after calcaneal fracture: comparison among three techniques
【24h】

Risk of injury to vascular-nerve bundle after calcaneal fracture: comparison among three techniques

机译:跟骨骨折后血管神经束受伤的风险:三种技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether the number of screws or pins placed in the calcaneus might increase the risk of injury when three different techniques for treating calcaneal fractures. METHOD: 126 radiographs of patients who suffered displaced calcaneal fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Three surgical techniques were analyzed on an interobserver basis: 31 radiographs of patients treated using plates that were not specific for the calcaneus, 48 using specific plates and 47 using an external fixator. The risk of injury to the anatomical structures in relation to each Kirschner wire or screw was determined using a graded system in accordance with the Licht classification. The total risk of injury to the anatomical structures through placement of more than one wire/screw was quantified using the additive law of probabilities for the product, for independent events. RESULTS: All of the models presented high explanatory power for the risk evaluated, since the coefficient of determination values ( R 2) were greater than 98.6 for all the models. Therefore, the set of variables studied explained more than 98.6% of the variations in the risks of injury to arteries, veins or nerves and can be classified as excellent models for prevention of injuries. CONCLUSION: The risk of injury to arteries, veins or nerves is not defined by the total number of pins/screws. The region and the number of pins/screws in each region define and determine the best distribution of the risk.
机译:目的:确定三种不同的治疗跟骨骨折技术时,放置在跟骨中的螺钉或销钉的数量是否会增加受伤的风险。方法:回顾性分析126例移位的跟骨骨折患者的X线照片。在观察者间基础上分析了三种手术技术:使用非跟骨特异性平板治疗的患者的31片X光片,使用特定平板治疗48例,使用外部固定器的47幅。根据Licht分类,使用分级系统确定与每根Kirschner线或螺钉有关的解剖结构受伤的风险。对于独立事件,使用产品概率累加定律对通过放置多于一根导线/螺钉而对解剖结构造成伤害的总风险进行了量化。结果:由于所有模型的确定系数(R 2)均大于98.6,因此所有模型都对风险评估具有较高的解释力。因此,所研究的变量集解释了98.6%以上的动脉,静脉或神经受伤风险的变化,并且可以被分类为预防伤害的极好模型。结论:动脉,静脉或神经受伤的风险未由销钉/螺钉总数确定。该区域以及每个区域中的销钉/螺钉数量定义并确定了风险的最佳分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号