首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva >Implementation of a rapid response team in a large nonprofit Brazilian hospital: improving the quality of emergency care through Plan-Do-Study-Act
【24h】

Implementation of a rapid response team in a large nonprofit Brazilian hospital: improving the quality of emergency care through Plan-Do-Study-Act

机译:在一家大型的非营利性巴西医院中建立快速反应小组:通过“计划-研究-行动”法提高急诊服务的质量

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To describe the implementation of a rapid response team in a large nonprofit hospital, indicating relevant issues for other initiatives in similar contexts, particularly in Latin America. Methods: In general terms, the intervention consisted of three major components: (1) a tool to detect aggravation of clinical conditions in general wards; (2) the structuring of a rapid response team to attend to all patients at risk; and (3) the monitoring of indicators regarding the intervention. This work employed four half-year Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test and adjust the intervention from January 2013 to December 2014. Results: Between 2013 and 2014, the rapid response team attended to 2,296 patients. This study showed a nonsignificant reduction in mortality from 8.3% in cycle 1 to 5.0% in cycle 4; however, death rates remained stable in cycles 3 and 4, with frequencies of 5.2% and 5.0%, respectively. Regarding patient flow and continuum of critical care, which is a premise of the rapid response system, there was a reduction in waiting time for intensive care unit beds with a decrease from 45.9% to 19.0% in the frequency of inpatients who could not be admitted immediately after indication (p 0.001), representing improved patient flow in the hospital. In addition, an increase in the recognition of palliative care patients from 2.8% to 10.3% was noted (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Implementing a rapid response team in contexts where there are structural restrictions, such as lack of intensive care unit beds, may be very beneficial, but a strategy of adjustment is needed.
机译:目的:描述一家大型非营利医院的快速反应团队的实施情况,并指出在类似情况下(特别是在拉丁美洲)其他计划的相关问题。方法:总的来说,干预包括三个主要部分:(1)一种检测普通病房临床病情恶化的工具; (2)组建快速反应小组,以照顾所有有风险的患者; (三)监测干预指标。这项工作从2013年1月至2014年12月采用了四个半年的计划-研究-行为周期来测试和调整干预措施。结果:2013年至2014年期间,快速反应小组共治疗了2296名患者。这项研究表明死亡率从第1周期的8.3%降低到第4周期的5.0%无明显降低;但是,死亡率在第3和第4周期保持稳定,频率分别为5.2%和5.0%。在快速反应系统的前提下,关于病人流量和重症监护的连续性,重症监护病房病床的等待时间减少了,无法入院的住院频率从45.9%减少到19.0%适应症后立即进行(p <0.001),表明医院的病人流量有所改善。此外,还注意到姑息治疗患者的认知度从2.8%提高到10.3%(p = 0.005)。结论:在存在结构性限制的情况下(例如缺少重症监护病床)建立一支快速反应团队可能会非常有益,但需要采取调整策略。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号