首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on 4DCT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation
【24h】

Interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on 4DCT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation

机译:基于4DCT扫描的针对部分束乳腺外照射的血清肿和手术夹在观察肿瘤床时的观察者间差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To explore the interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on the four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI) during free breathing. Methods Patients with a seroma clarity score (SCS) 3?~?5 and ≥5 surgical clips in the lumpectomy cavity after breast-conserving surgery who were recruited for EB-PBI underwent 4DCT simulation. Based on the ten sets of 4DCT images acquired, the tumour bed formed using the clips, the seroma, and both the clips and seroma (defined as TBC, TBS and TBC+S, respectively) were delineated by five radiation oncologists using specific guidelines. The following parameters were calculated to analyse interobserver variability: volume of the tumour bed (TBC, TBS, TBC+S), coefficient of variation (COVC, COVS, COVC+S), and matching degree (MDC, MDS, MDC+S). Results The interobserver variability for TBC and TBC+S and for COVC and COVC+S were statistically significant (p?=?0.021, 0.008, 0.002, 0.015). No significant difference was observed for TBS and COVS (p?=?0.867, 0.061). Significant differences in interobserver variability were observed for MDC vs MDS, MDC vs MDC+S, MDS vs MDC+S (p?=?0.000, 0.032, 0.008), the interobserver variability of MDS was smaller than that of MDC and MDC+S (MDS?>?MDC+S?>?MDC). Conclusions When the SCS was 3?~?5 points and the number of surgical clips was ≥5, interobserver variability was minimal for the delineation of the tumour bed based on seroma.
机译:背景技术为探讨自由呼吸过程中使用束线和外科夹子基于四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)扫描进行的局部束局部乳房照射(EB-PBI)的观察者之间的变异性。方法保乳手术后在乳房切除术腔内血清清澈度评分(SCS)为3?〜?5和≥5个手术夹的患者接受EB-PBI的患者进行4DCT模拟。根据获取的十组4DCT图像,由五名放射肿瘤学家按照特定指南描绘了使用夹子,血清肿以及夹子和血清肿(分别定义为TBC,TBS和TBC + S)形成的肿瘤床。计算以下参数以分析观察者间的变异性:肿瘤床的体积(TBC,TBS,TBC + S),变异系数(COVC,COVS,COVC + S)和匹配度(MDC,MDS,MDC + S) 。结果TBC和TBC + S以及COVC和COVC + S的观察者间差异具有统计学意义(p≤0.021、0.008、0.002、0.015)。对于TBS和COVS没有观察到显着差异(p≤0.867,0.061)。 MDC与MDS,MDC与MDC + S,MDS与MDC + S的观察者间变异性存在显着差异(p?=?0.000、0.032、0.008),MDS的观察者间变异性小于MDC和MDC + S (MDS?>?MDC + S?>?MDC)。结论当SCS为3?〜?5点且手术夹数量≥5时,根据血清肿物划定肿瘤床的观察者间差异最小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号