首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >The feasibility analysis of omission of elective irradiation to level IB lymph nodes in low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 2013 updated consensus guideline for neck nodal levels
【24h】

The feasibility analysis of omission of elective irradiation to level IB lymph nodes in low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 2013 updated consensus guideline for neck nodal levels

机译:根据2013年更新的颈部淋巴结水平共识指南,在低危鼻咽癌中省略IB级淋巴结选择性照射的可行性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Level IB metastasis is rare in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The purpose of this study is to investigate the high-risk factors for level IB metastasis and evaluate the feasibility of omission of elective irradiation to level IB in the low-risk subgroups in NPC. Methods This retrospective study identified 532 patients with NPC treated by definitive radiation in our institution from 2009 to 2010. Level IB nodes were electively irradiated based on the physician’s decision. Diagnostic head and neck MRIs were reviewed. The involvements of nodal levels were evaluated according to 2013 updated guidelines of RTOG. The correlations of level IB metastasis and other factors were studied using Chi-square test and logistic regression model. Log-rank tests were used to compare survival rates. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the effect of various factors. Patient-reported xerostomia was recoded in every follow-up and the extents of?delayed xerostomia at 1 year post-radiation were compared between those with/without elective level IB irradiation. Results N stage, bilateral nodal metastasis, level II involvement, level IIA involvement, level IIA with multiple levels involvement, maximal axial diameter (MAD) of level IIA nodes >?20?mm, MAD of neck lymph nodes >?30?mm, necrosis of level IIA nodes, extracapsular spread of level IIA correlated with level IB metastasis by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis (MVA), bilateral nodal involvement, MAD of level IIA nodes >?20?mm or extracapsular spread of level IIA nodes, were independent predictive factors for level IB metastasis. Patients without either these factors were denoted low-risk group and the rest high-risk group. Of the low-risk group, there was no significant difference of regional control and overall survival (OS) between those with or without elective irradiation. The percentage of level IB recurrence of those without elective irradiation was 0.46%. Elective level IB irradiation was not significant upon MVA both for regional control and OS. Of the high-risk group, elective level IB irradiation was marginal significant for regional control, but not for OS upon MVA. No regional recurrence located at level IB. Overall, omission of elective irradiation to level IB reduced the mean doses of submandibular glands, but did not improve patient-reported xerostomia. Conclusion For patients without high-risk factors of level IB metastasis, omission of elective level IB irradiation did not impair regional control and OS in NPC.
机译:背景水平IB转移在鼻咽癌(NPC)中很少见。这项研究的目的是调查NPC低危亚组中IB级转移的高风险因素,并评估是否将IB选择性放射线省略的可行性。方法这项回顾性研究确定了2009年至2010年间我院接受确诊放射治疗的532例NPC患者。根据医师的决定对IB级结节进行了选择性放射治疗。回顾了诊断性头颈MRI。根据2013年RTOG更新指南评估了节点水平的影响。采用卡方检验和logistic回归模型研究了IB水平转移与其他因素的相关性。使用对数秩检验来比较生存率。使用Cox比例风险模型评估各种因素的影响。在每次随访中都对患者报告的口干症进行了重新编码,并比较了选择/不选择IB级照射者在放疗后1年的口干延迟程度。结果N期,双侧淋巴结转移,II级受累,IIA级受累,IIA级有多级受累,IIA级淋巴结的最大轴向直径(MAD)> 20毫米,颈淋巴结的MAD大于30毫米,通过单因素分析,IIA级结节坏死,IIA级囊外扩散与IB级转移相关。在多变量分析(MVA)中,双侧淋巴结受累,IIA级结节的MAD> 20 µmm或IIA级结节的囊外扩散是IB级转移的独立预测因素。没有这两种因素的患者分别称为低风险组和其余的高风险组。在低风险组中,有或没有选择性照射者之间的区域控制和总体生存率(OS)均无显着差异。没有选择照射的IB复发水平为0.46%。对于区域控制和OS而言,IB选修水平对MVA均无显着影响。在高危人群中,IB选择性射血对于区域控制而言是微不足道的,但对于MVA后的OS则无意义。 IB级没有区域性复发。总体而言,省略选择性辐射至IB级可降低下颌下腺的平均剂量,但不能改善患者报告的口腔干燥症。结论对于没有高水平IB转移的危险因素的患者,省略IB水平选择性放射不会损害NPC的区域控制和OS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号