...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Comparison of primary target volumes delineated on four-dimensional CT and 18?F-FDG PET/CT of non-small-cell lung cancer
【24h】

Comparison of primary target volumes delineated on four-dimensional CT and 18?F-FDG PET/CT of non-small-cell lung cancer

机译:非小细胞肺癌的三维CT和 18 ?F-FDG PET / CT描述的主要靶标量比较

获取原文

摘要

Background To determine the optimal threshold of 18?F-fluorodexyglucose (18?F-FDG) positron emission tomography CT (PET/CT) images that generates the best volumetric match to internal gross target volume (IGTV) based on four-dimensional CT (4DCT) images. Methods Twenty patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent enhanced three-dimensional CT (3DCT) scan followed by enhanced 4DCT scan of the thorax under normal free breathing with the administration of intravenous contrast agents. A total of 100 ml of ioversol was injected intravenously, 2 ml/s for 3DCT and 1 ml/s for 4DCT. Then 18?F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed based on the same positioning parameters (the same immobilization devices and identical position verified by laser localizer as well as skin marks). Gross target volumes (GTVs) of the primary tumor were contoured on the ten phases images of 4DCT to generate IGTV10. GTVPET were determined with eight different threshold using an auto-contouring function. The differences in the position, volume, concordance index (CI) and degree of inclusion (DI) of the targets between GTVPET and IGTV10 were compared. Results The images from seventeen patients were suitable for further analysis. Significant differences between the centric coordinate positions of GTVPET (excluding GTVPET15%) and IGTV10 were observed only in z axes (P?
机译:背景技术为了确定18?F-氟葡萄糖(18?F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描CT(PET / CT)图像的最佳阈值,该图像可根据四维CT(CT)生成与内部总目标体积(IGTV)最佳的体积匹配( 4DCT)图片。方法对20例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,在正常自由呼吸下,静脉注射造影剂,对其进行增强的三维CT(3DCT)扫描,然后进行增强的4DCT胸部扫描。静脉注射总共100 ml的艾佛索尔,3DCT注射2 ml / s,4DCT注射1 ml / s。然后,基于相同的定位参数(相同的固定装置和相同的位置(通过激光定位器以及皮肤痕迹验证))执行18 F-FDG PET / CT扫描。在4DCT的十阶段图像上绘制原发肿瘤的总目标体积(GTV),以生成IGTV10。使用自动轮廓功能以8个不同的阈值确定GTVPET。比较了GTVPET和IGTV10在目标位置,体积,一致性指数(CI)和包涵度(DI)方面的差异。结果17例患者的图像适合进一步分析。仅在z轴上观察到GTVPET(不包括GTVPET15%)和IGTV10的中心坐标位置之间的显着差异(P≤0.05)。 GTVPET15%,GTVPET25%和GTVPET2.0与IGTV10差异无统计学意义(P <0.05)。 GTVPET15%接近IGTV10,中位数体积变化为4.86%。最佳CI在IGTV10和GTVPET15%之间(0.57)。 IGTV10在GTVPET中的最佳DI是IGTV10在GTVPET15%(0.80)中。结论基于PET的轮廓没有一个与4DCT IGTV10的空间和体积近似。目前,不应将3D-PET / CT用于IGTV生成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号