首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >The role of end-of-life palliative sedation: medical and ethical aspects - Review
【24h】

The role of end-of-life palliative sedation: medical and ethical aspects - Review

机译:临终姑息镇静的作用:医学和伦理学方面-综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and objective: Palliative sedation is a medical procedure that has been used for more than 25 years to relieve refractory symptoms not responsive to any previous treatment in patients with no possibility of cure and near the end of life. Many uncertainties persist on the theme regarding definition, indications, decision making, most appropriate place to perform the procedure, most used drugs, need for monitoring, fluids and nutritional support, and possible ethical dilemmas. The objective of this review was to seek a probable consensus among the authors regarding these topics not yet fully defined. Method: An exploratory search was made in secondary sources, from 1990 to 2016, regarding palliative sedation and its clinical and bioethical implications. Conclusions: Palliative sedation is an alternative to alleviate end-of-life patient suffering due to refractory symptoms, particularly dyspnea and delirium, after all other treatment options have been exhausted. Decision making involves prior explanations, discussions and agreement of the team, patient, and/or family members. It can be performed in general hospital units, hospices and even at home. Midazolam is the most indicated drug, and neuroleptics may also be required in the presence of delirium. These patients' monitoring is limited to comfort observation, relief of symptoms, and presence of adverse effects. There is no consensus on whether or not to suspend fluid and nutritional support, and the decision must be made with family members. From the bioethical standpoint, the great majority of authors are based on intention and proportionality to distinguish between palliative sedation, euthanasia, or assisted suicide.
机译:背景与目的:姑息镇静是一种医疗程序,已被使用了25年以上,以缓解顽固性症状,这种症状对于没有治愈可能性且即将寿终的患者无任何先前的治疗反应。关于定义,适应症,决策,最合适的手术位置,使用最多的药物,监测的需要,液体和营养支持以及可能的道德困境,该主题仍然存在许多不确定性。这篇综述的目的是在作者之间就尚未完全定义的这些主题寻求可能的共识。方法:从1990年至2016年对次要来源进行姑息镇静及其临床和生物伦理意义的探索性研究。结论:在所有其他治疗方法都用尽后,姑息镇静是缓解因难治性症状(尤其是呼吸困难和ir妄)而导致的临终患者痛苦的替代方法。决策需要团队,患者和/或家人的事先解释,讨论和同意。它可以在综合医院的单位,医院或什至在家中进行。咪达唑仑是最适合的药物,在有ir妄的情况下可能还需要抗精神病药。这些患者的监测仅限于舒适性观察,症状缓解和不良反应的存在。关于是否要中止液体和营养支持尚无共识,因此必须与家庭成员一起做出决定。从生物伦理学的角度来看,绝大多数作者都是基于意图和相称性来区分姑息镇静,安乐死或辅助自杀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号