首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study ☆
【24h】

Acquiring skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management: comparison of high-fidelity simulation versus computer-based case study ☆

机译:恶性高温危机管理中的技能掌握:高保真模拟与基于计算机的案例研究的比较☆

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effect of high fidelity simulation versus a computer-based case solving self-study, in skills acquisition about malignant hyperthermia on first year anesthesiology residents. Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval, 31 first year anesthesiology residents were enrolled in this prospective randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to either a High Fidelity Simulation Scenario or a computer-based Case Study about malignant hyperthermia. After the intervention, all subjects' performance in was assessed through a high fidelity simulation scenario using a previously validated assessment rubric. Additionally, knowledge tests and a satisfaction survey were applied. Finally, a semi-structured interview was done to assess self-perception of reasoning process and decision-making. Results: 28 first year residents finished successfully the study. Resident's management skill scores were globally higher in High Fidelity Simulation versus Case Study, however they were significant in 4 of the 8 performance rubric elements: recognize signs and symptoms ( p = 0.025), prioritization of initial actions of management ( p = 0.003), recognize complications ( p = 0.025) and communication ( p = 0.025). Average scores from pre- and post-test knowledge questionnaires improved from 74% to 85% in the High Fidelity Simulation group, and decreased from 78% to 75% in the Case Study group ( p = 0.032). Regarding the qualitative analysis, there was no difference in factors influencing the student's process of reasoning and decision-making with both teaching strategies. Conclusion: Simulation-based training with a malignant hyperthermia high-fidelity scenario was superior to computer-based case study, improving knowledge and skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management, with a very good satisfaction level in anesthesia residents.
机译:简介:这项研究的主要目的是比较高保真模拟与基于计算机的案例解决方案自学在第一年麻醉学住院医师恶性高热技能获取中的效果。方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,该前瞻性随机单盲研究纳入了31名第一年麻醉医师。参与者被随机分为高保真模拟方案或基于计算机的恶性高热案例研究。干预后,使用先前已验证的评估规则通过高保真模拟方案评估所有受试者的表现。此外,还进行了知识测试和满意度调查。最后,进行了半结构化访谈,以评估对推理过程和决策的自我认知。结果:28名第一年的居民成功完成了研究。在“高保真模拟”中,居民的管理技能得分总体上高于案例研究,但在8个绩效指标中,有4个得分显着:识别体征和症状(p = 0.025),优先采取初始管理措施(p = 0.003),识别并发症(p = 0.025)和沟通(p = 0.025)。高保真模拟组的测试前和测试后知识问卷的平均分数从74%提高到85%,而案例研究组的平均分数从78%降低到75%(p = 0.032)。在定性分析方面,两种教学策略对学生推理和决策过程的影响因素没有差异。结论:在恶性热疗高保真场景下进行的基于模拟的培训优于基于计算机的案例研究,提高了恶性热疗危机管理中的知识和技能,麻醉居民的满意度很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号