首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Sistemas respiratórios com absor??o de CO2, circulares, valvulares: compara??o do comportamento térmico entre sistema coaxial e convencional com diferentes fluxos de gás fresco
【24h】

Sistemas respiratórios com absor??o de CO2, circulares, valvulares: compara??o do comportamento térmico entre sistema coaxial e convencional com diferentes fluxos de gás fresco

机译:圆形,阀形,具有CO2吸收的呼吸系统:同轴系统与具有不同新鲜气体流量的常规系统之间的热性能比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The adequate maintenance of inhaled gases temperature during anesthetic procedures is critical to prevent perioperative respiratory complications. This study aimed at comparing the ability to warm up inhaled gases of coaxial breathing system and conventional system, by varying fresh gas flows (FGF). METHODS: Breathing systems were tested in a lung simulator ventilated with 600 mL tidal volume and respiratory frequency of 10 bpm. The model simulated human CO2 production by delivering 250 mL.min-1 of CO2 flow. Then, exhaled gas from the model was directed to a pre-warmed humidifier to simulate human exhaled gas. Both systems were classified as circle, valve circuits with CO2 absorption. In the coaxial system (model A), the inspiratory branch was enveloped by the expiratory branch, whereas the conventional one (model B) presented separated respiratory branches. Inhaled gas temperature was measured at the following moments: 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 90 minutes, with low (0.5 and 1 L.min-1) and high (3 and 6 L.min-1) FGF. RESULTS: Model A presented significant thermal variation between beginning and end of experiment (22.47 ± 1.77 oC and 24.27 ± 3.52 oC respectively, p < 0.05). Both models A and B produced similar temperatures at the end of the study (24.27 ± 3.52 oC and 23.61 ± 1.93 oC respectively). There was no difference between final temperatures of both models and environmental temperature (21.25 ± 1.20 oC and 21.81 ± 1,87 oC respectively). Low FGF has produced similar temperatures to those observed at the end of the study with higher flows in both models (A: 25.53 ± 4.78 oC and 23.02 ± 0.80 oC; B: 24.50 ± 0.85 oC and 22.72 ± 2.36 oC, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The coaxial system presented significant thermal variation between beginning and end of experiment, while this was not observed in the conventional one. No difference was observed in final temperatures when comparing both systems, regardless of the FGF.
机译:背景与目的:麻醉过程中充分保持吸入气体的温度对预防围手术期呼吸系统并发症至关重要。这项研究旨在通过改变新鲜气体流量(FGF)比较同轴呼吸系统和常规系统的预热吸入气体的能力。方法:呼吸系统在肺模拟器中进行测试,呼吸机的潮气量为600 mL,呼吸频率为10 bpm。该模型通过输送250 mL.min-1的CO2流量模拟了人类的CO2产生。然后,将来自模型的呼出气体导入预热的加湿器,以模拟人的呼出气体。两种系统均被归类为具有CO2吸收的环形阀回路。在同轴系统(模型A)中,吸气分支被呼气分支包裹着,而传统的(模型B)呈现出分离的呼吸分支。在以下时刻测量吸入的气体温度:0、5、10、20、30、40、50、60和90分钟,低(0.5和1 L.min-1)和高(3和6 L.min -1)FGF。结果:模型A在实验开始和结束之间表现出显着的热变化(分别为22.47±1.77 oC和24.27±3.52 oC,p <0.05)。在研究结束时,模型A和B产生的温度相似(分别为24.27±3.52 oC和23.61±1.93 oC)。两种型号的最终温度与环境温度之间没有差异(分别为21.25±1.20 oC和21.81±1,87 oC)。低FGF产生的温度与研究结束时观察到的温度相似,两个模型的流量都较高(A:25.53±4.78 oC和23.02±0.80 oC; B:24.50±0.85 oC和22.72±2.36 oC)。结论:同轴系统在实验的开始和结束之间表现出明显的热变化,而在常规系统中没有观察到。比较两个系统时,无论FGF如何,最终温度都没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号