首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Compara??o entre o enflurano e o propofol na eletroconvulsoterapia: um estudo preliminar, aleatório, aberto e cruzado sobre a dura??o de convuls?es e a recupera??o anestésica
【24h】

Compara??o entre o enflurano e o propofol na eletroconvulsoterapia: um estudo preliminar, aleatório, aberto e cruzado sobre a dura??o de convuls?es e a recupera??o anestésica

机译:惊厥治疗中恩氟烷和丙泊酚的比较:癫痫发作持续时间和麻醉剂恢复的初步,随机,开放和交叉研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is commonly used for treatment of depression, mania and affective disorders. Anaesthetics for general anaesthesia during ECT should have rapid onset, rapid emerge, not interfere with seizure activity and not shorten seizure duration. The aim of this study is to compare effects of enflurane, a pro-convulsive anaesthetic agent, and propofol on seizure durations, postictal suppression index and recovery times during electroconvulsive therapy. METHODS: Unpremedicated subjects were divided into two groups according to induction of anaesthesia. Patients were induced for ECT with 5% enflurane in group E and 1.2 mg.kg-1 propofol in group P until loss of consciousness. The durations of electroencephalogram (EEG) and motor seizures, postictal suppression index, time to spontaneous breathing, duration of eye opening, and obeying commands were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding motor and EEG seizure times and postictal suppression index on the EEG records. Recovery times (times of starting spontaneous breathing, eye opening, and obeying command) were significantly shorter in group E compared to group P. No nausea or vomiting were observed and no ECG abnormality was noted except transient sinus bradycardia and sinus tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Although sufficient seizure for the treatment was provided during enflurane anaesthesia, any additional benefit was not revealed regarding seizure times or postictal suppression index when compared to propofol anaesthesia. On the other hand, recovery times after enflurane anaesthesia were shorter than propofol anaesthesia. However, there is still a need for further study in different ETCO2 levels.
机译:背景与目的:电痉挛疗法(ECT)通常用于治疗抑郁症,躁狂症和情感障碍。 ECT期间进行全身麻醉的麻醉剂应起效快,出现快,不干扰癫痫发作活动并且不缩短癫痫发作持续时间。这项研究的目的是比较惊厥前麻醉药恩氟烷和丙泊酚对电惊厥治疗期间癫痫发作持续时间,姿势抑制指数和恢复时间的影响。方法:根据麻醉诱导情况,将未接受治疗的受试者分为两组。 E组诱导患者接受ECT麻醉,E组注射5%的安普兰,P组接受1.2 mg.kg-1的异丙酚,直至失去知觉。记录脑电图(EEG)和运动性癫痫发作的持续时间,姿势抑制指数,自发呼吸时间,睁眼持续时间和服从命令。结果:在运动和脑电图发作时间和脑电图记录中的抑制抑制指数方面,各组之间无统计学差异。与E组相比,E组的恢复时间(开始自发呼吸,睁眼和服从命令的时间)明显缩短。除短暂性窦性心动过缓和窦性心动过速外,未观察到恶心或呕吐,也未观察到ECG异常。结论:尽管在环戊烷麻醉期间可为治疗提供足够的癫痫发作,但与丙泊酚麻醉相比,癫痫发作时间或姿势抑制指数并未显示任何其他益处。另一方面,Enflurane麻醉后的恢复时间短于异丙酚麻醉。但是,仍然需要在不同的ETCO2水平下进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号