首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Estudo comparativo entre clonidina associada à bupivacaína e bupivacaína isolada em bloqueio de plexo cervical para endarterectomia de carótida
【24h】

Estudo comparativo entre clonidina associada à bupivacaína e bupivacaína isolada em bloqueio de plexo cervical para endarterectomia de carótida

机译:可乐定联合布比卡因与孤立布比卡因在颈丛神经阻滞术中分离颈动脉内膜的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurological evaluation can be done during cervical plexus block for endarterectomy, which also maintains postoperative analgesia. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of clonidine associated with bupivacaine to those of bupivacaine in cervical plexus block. METHODS: A randomized double-blind study was undertaken with 30 patients divided in two groups: G1 received 1.5 mg.kg-1 of 0.375% bupivacaine associated with 150 ?g of clonidine (2 mL), and G2 received 1.5 mg.kg-1 of 0.375% bupivacaine associated with NS (2 mL). The following parameters were evaluated: heart rate and blood pressure at 0 (block), 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes; the need for anesthetic supplementation; time until the first analgesic supplementation; amount of analgesic used; and pain severity at 0 (end of the surgery), 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes. RESULTS: Group 1 received 3.8 mL of lidocaine for anesthetic supplementation, while G2 received 3.6 mL of lidocaine, but this difference was not statistically significant. In G1, the time until the first supplementation was 302.6 ± 152.6 minutes, and in G2 it was 236.6 ± 132.9 minutes, which was not statistically significant. Differences between the doses of dypirone and tramadol were not observed. Differences in pain severity between both groups were not observed either. CONCLUSION: The association of 150 ?g of clonidine and bupivacaine in cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy did not improve significantly the analgesic effects evaluated by pain severity, time until the first analgesic supplementations and amount of supplementary analgesics.
机译:背景与目的:可以在颈丛神经阻滞术中进行动脉内膜切除术,并保持术后镇痛效果。这项研究的目的是比较可乐定与布比卡因相关的镇痛作用与布比卡因在颈丛神经阻滞中的镇痛作用。方法:一项随机双盲研究对30位患者进行了分为两组:G1接受1.5 mg.kg-1的0.375%布比卡因与150μg可乐定(2 mL)相关,G2接受1.5 mg.kg- 0.375%布比卡因中有1个与NS有关(2 mL)。评估以下参数:0(封闭),30、60、90和120分钟时的心率和血压;需要补充麻醉剂;直到第一次补充镇痛药的时间;止痛药的用量;和0(手术结束),30、60、120、240和360分钟时的疼痛严重程度。结果:第一组接受了3.8 mL利多卡因的麻醉剂补充,而G2接受了3.6 mL的利多卡因,但是这种差异在统计学上没有统计学意义。在G1中,直到第一次补充的时间为302.6±152.6分钟,在G2中为236.6±132.9分钟,这在统计学上没有统计学意义。没有观察到dypirone和tramadol剂量之间的差异。两组之间的疼痛严重程度也没有观察到差异。结论:150克可乐定和布比卡因联合颈丛内膜切除术用于颈动脉内膜切除术并不能显着改善通过疼痛严重程度,首次使用镇痛药的时间和补充镇痛药的量所得出的镇痛效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号