首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Estudo comparativo de antieméticos e suas associa??es, na preven??o de náuseas e v?mitos pós-operatórios, em pacientes submetidas a procedimentos cirúrgicos ginecológicos
【24h】

Estudo comparativo de antieméticos e suas associa??es, na preven??o de náuseas e v?mitos pós-operatórios, em pacientes submetidas a procedimentos cirúrgicos ginecológicos

机译:妇科手术患者中止吐药及其协会在预防术后恶心和呕吐方面的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting has been the subject of several studies. The objective of the present study was to compare anti-emetics, and their association, in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Seventy patients, ASA I and II, underwent epidural block associated with general anesthesia for gynecologic surgeries. Patients in the Metochlopramide Group (MG) received 20 mg of the drug; the Dexamethasone Group (DeG) received 8 mg; the Droperidol Group (DrG) received 1.25 mg; the Ondansetron Group (OG) received 8 mg; the Dexamethasone-Ondansetron Group (DeOG) received 8 mg and 4 mg, respectively; the Droperidol-Ondansetron Group (DrOG) received 1.25 mg and 4 mg, respectively; the Dexamethasone-Droperidol-Ondansetron Group (DeDrOG) received 8 mg, 0.625 mg, and 4 mg. The presence of nausea and vomiting was evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours after the end of the surgery. RESULTS: The total incidence of episodes of nausea per group is as follows: 4 in DeDrOG, 6 in OG, 6 in DrOG, 11 in DeG, 11 in DeOG, 18 in MG, and 22 in DrG. The Chi-square and Fisher exact tests indicated statistically significant differences between DrG and DeG, DOG, DrOG, DeOG, and DeDrOG; between MG and OG, DrOG, and DeDrOG; and between DeOG and DeDrOG. And the incidence of vomiting was: 3 in OG, 3 in DeDrOG, 6 in DrOG, 7 in DeG, 7 in DeOG, and 10 in DrG, and 13 in G. There was a statistically significant difference between DrG and OG and DeDrOG; and between MG and OG and DeDrOG. CONCLUSIONS: The association dexamethasone-droperidol-ondansetron and ondansetron alone were more effective in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting.
机译:背景与目的:预防术后恶心和呕吐已成为多项研究的主题。本研究的目的是比较止吐药及其关联在预防术后恶心和呕吐中的作用。方法:70例ASA I和II型患者因妇科手术而接受全麻硬膜外阻滞。甲氧氯普胺组(MG)的患者接受20毫克的药物治疗;地塞米松组(DeG)服用8毫克;氟哌利多组(DrG)接受1.25 mg;恩丹西酮组(OG)服用8毫克;地塞米松-恩丹西酮组(DeOG)分别接受8 mg和4 mg; Droperidol-Ondansetron组(DrOG)分别接受1.25 mg和4 mg;地塞米松-哌替啶-恩丹西酮组(DeDrOG)分别接受8 mg,0.625 mg和4 mg。在手术结束后的6、12、24和36小时评估恶心和呕吐的存在。结果:每组恶心发作的总发生率如下:DeDrOG 4例,OG 6例,DrOG 6例,DeG 11例,DeOG 11例,MG 18例,DrG 22例。卡方检验和Fisher精确检验表明,DrG和DeG,DOG,DrOG,DeOG和DeDrOG之间存在统计学差异。在MG和OG,DrOG和DeDrOG之间;在DeOG和DeDrOG之间。呕吐的发生率是:OG 3例,DeDrOG 3例,DrOG 6例,DeG 7例,DeOG 7例,DrG 10例,G者13例。DrG与OG和DeDrOG之间有统计学差异。在MG与OG和DeDrOG之间。结论:单独使用地塞米松-氟哌利多-恩丹西酮和恩丹西酮的联合在预防恶心和呕吐方面更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号