首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Baixa dose de bupivacaína isobárica, hiperbárica ou hipobárica para raquianestesia unilateral
【24h】

Baixa dose de bupivacaína isobárica, hiperbárica ou hipobárica para raquianestesia unilateral

机译:小剂量等压,高压或低压布比卡因用于单侧脊柱麻醉

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Unilateral spinal anesthesia has its advantages, especially in patients undergoing outpatient basis surgeries. Low dose, slow speed of administration, and the lateral positioning make easier the unilateral distribution in spinal anesthesia. Isobaric, hyperbaric, and hypobaric solutions of bupivacaine were compared in the unilateral spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient basis orthopedic surgeries. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients were randomly divided in three groups to receive 5 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine (Iso Group), 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (Hyper Group), or 5 mg of 0.15% hypobaric bupivacaine (Hypo Group). The solutions were administered in the L3-L4 space with the patient in the lateral decubitus and remaining in this position for 20 minutes. Sensitive anesthesia was evaluated by the pin prick test. Motor blockade was determined by the modified Bromage scale. Both blockades were compared with the opposite side and among themselves. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the side of the surgery and the opposite side in all three groups at 20 minutes, but the frequency of unilateral spinal anesthesia was greater with the hyperbaric and hypobaric solutions. Sensitive and motor blockades were observed in 14 patients in the Iso Group, 38 patients in the Hyper Group, and 40 patients in the Hypo Group. Patients did not develop any hemodynamic changes. Postpuncture headache and transitory neurological symptoms were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with hypobaric and hyperbaric solutions present a higher frequency of unilateral anesthesia. After 20 minutes, isobaric bupivacaine mobilized into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) resulted in unilateral spinal anesthesia in only 28% of the patients.
机译:背景与目的:单侧脊柱麻醉具有其优势,尤其是在接受门诊手术的患者中。低剂量,缓慢给药速度和侧向定位使脊柱麻醉中的单侧分布更容易。在接受门诊整形外科手术的患者的单侧脊柱麻醉中比较了布比卡因的等压,高压和低压溶液。方法:将150例患者随机分为三组,分别接受5 mg 0.5%的异巴比卡因(Iso组),5 mg 0.5%的高压布比卡因(Hyper组)或5 mg的0.15%低压布比卡因(Hypo组) )。溶液在L3-L4空间中进行给药,患者侧卧位,并在该位置保持20分钟。通过针刺试验评估敏感性麻醉。通过改良的Bromage量表确定运动阻滞。将这两种封锁与对方以及对方之间进行了比较。结果:在20分钟时,三组的手术侧和相对侧之间存在显着差异,但是高压和低压溶液的单侧脊柱麻醉频率更高。 Iso组的14例患者,Hyper组的38例和Hypo组的40例观察到了敏感性和运动阻滞。患者没有任何血液动力学变化。没有观察到穿刺后头痛和短暂的神经系统症状。结论:高压和低压溶液的脊髓麻醉表现出较高的单侧麻醉频率。 20分钟后,将异丁酸布比卡因动员到脑脊液(CSF)中,仅28%的患者进行了单侧脊柱麻醉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号