...
首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing >Difference and Potential of the Upward and Downward Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence on Detecting Leaf Nitrogen Concentration in Wheat
【24h】

Difference and Potential of the Upward and Downward Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence on Detecting Leaf Nitrogen Concentration in Wheat

机译:向上和向下诱导的叶绿素荧光在检测小麦叶片氮含量上的差异和潜力

获取原文

摘要

Precise detection of leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) is helpful for nutrient diagnosis and fertilization guidance in farm crops. Numerous researchers have estimated LNC with techniques based on reflectance spectra or active chlorophyll fluorescence, which have limitations of low accuracy or small scale in the field. Given the correlation between chlorophyll and nitrogen contents, the response of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to chlorophyll (Chl) content reported in a few papers suggests the feasibility of quantifying LNC using SIF. Few studies have investigated the difference and power of the upward and downward SIF components on monitoring LNC in winter wheat. We conducted two field experiments to evaluate the capacity of SIF to monitor the LNC of winter wheat during the entire growth season and compare the differences of the upward and downward SIF for LNC detection. A FluoWat leaf clip coupled with a ASD spectrometer was used to measure the upward and downward SIF under sunlight. It was found that three (↓FY687, ↑FY687/↑FY739, and ↓FY687/↓FY739) out of the six SIF yield (FY) indices examined were significantly correlated to the LNC (R 2 = 0.6, 0.51, 0.75, respectively). The downward SIF yield indices exhibited better performance than the upward FY indices in monitoring the LNC with the ↓FY687/↓FY739 being the best FY index. Moreover, the LNC models based on the three SIF yield indices are insensitive to the chlorophyll content and the leaf mass per area (LMA). These findings suggest the downward SIF should not be neglected for monitoring crop LNC at the leaf scale, although it is more difficult to measure with current instruments. The downward SIF could play an increasingly important role in understanding of the SIF emission for LNC detection at different scales. These results could provide a solid foundation for elucidating the mechanism of SIF for LNC estimation at the canopy scale.
机译:精确检测叶氮浓度(LNC)有助于农作物营养诊断和施肥指导。许多研究人员已经通过基于反射光谱或活性叶绿素荧光的技术对LNC进行了估算,这些技术在该领域存在精度低或规模小的局限性。考虑到叶绿素和氮含量之间的相关性,几篇论文中报道的太阳诱导的叶绿素荧光(SIF)对叶绿素(Chl)含量的响应表明了使用SIF定量LNC的可行性。很少有研究调查向上和向下SIF分量对监测冬小麦LNC的差异和影响。我们进行了两个田间试验,以评估SIF在整个生长季节监测冬小麦LNC的能力,并比较SIF向上和向下用于LNC检测的差异。使用FluoWat叶片夹和ASD光谱仪测量阳光下的向上和向下SIF。发现在所检查的六个SIF收益(FY)指数中,三个(↓FY687,↑FY687 /↑FY739和↓FY687 /↓FY739)与LNC显着相关(R 2分别为0.6、0.51、0.75) )。在对LNC的监测中,SIF向下的收益率指数表现优于向上的FY指数,其中↓FY687 /↓FY739是最佳的FY指数。此外,基于三个SIF产量指数的LNC模型对叶绿素含量和每单位面积叶片质量(LMA)不敏感。这些发现表明,向下的SIF在叶尺度上监测农作物LNC时不应忽略,尽管使用当前的仪器很难测量。向下的SIF在理解SIF发射以用于不同规模的LNC检测方面可能起着越来越重要的作用。这些结果可为阐明SIF进行冠层尺度LNC估计的机制提供坚实的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号