首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Reliance on God’s Help in Patients with Depressive and Addictive Disorders is not Associated with Their Depressive Symptoms
【24h】

Reliance on God’s Help in Patients with Depressive and Addictive Disorders is not Associated with Their Depressive Symptoms

机译:抑郁和上瘾性疾病患者对上帝帮助的依赖与他们的抑郁症状无关

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: Although there are several reports which support a (negative) association between depression and spirituality/religiosity, the specific nature of the relationships remains unclear. To address whether patients with depressive and/or addictive disorders use this resource at all, we focused on a circumscribed variable of intrinsic religiosity, and analyzed putative associations between intrinsic religiosity, depression, life satisfaction and internal adaptive coping strategies. Methods: We referred to data of 111 patients with either depressive and/or addictive disorders treated in three German clinics. For this anonym cross sectional study, standardized instruments were used, i.e., the 5-item scale Reliance on God’s Help (RGH), Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), the 3-item scale Escape from Illness, the Brief Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Scale (BMLSS), and internal adaptive coping strategies as measured with the AKU questionnaire. Results: Patients with addictive disorders had significantly higher RGH than patients with depressive disorders (F = 3.6; p = 0.03). Correlation analyses revealed that RGH was not significantly associated with the BDI scores, instead depressive symptoms were significantly associated with life satisfaction and internal adaptive coping strategies (i.e., Reappraisal: Illness as Chance and Conscious Living). Patients with either low or high RGH did not significantly differ with respect to their BDI scores. None of the underlying dimensions of RGH were associated with depression scores, but with life satisfaction and (negatively) with Escape from illness. Nevertheless, patients with high RGH had significantly higher adaptive coping strategies. Regression analyses revealed that Reappraisal as a cognitive coping strategy to re-define the value of illness and to use it as a chance of development (i.e., change attitudes and behavior), was the best predictor of patients’ RGH (Beta = 0.36, p = 0.001), while neither depression as underlying disease (as compared to addictive disorders) nor patients’ life satisfaction had a significant influence on their RGH. Conclusions: Although RGH was significantly higher in patients with addictive disorders than in patients with depressive disorders, depressive symptoms are not significantly associated with patients’ intrinsic religiosity. Particularly those patients with high intrinsic religiosity seem to have stronger access to positive (internal) strategies to cope, and higher life satisfaction. Whether spirituality/religiosity is used by the patients as a reliable resource may depend on their individual experience during live, their expectations, and specific world-view.
机译:目的:尽管有几份报道支持抑郁与灵性/宗教信仰之间的(负性)联系,但这种关系的具体性质仍不清楚。为了解决患有抑郁症和/或成瘾性疾病的患者是否全部使用此资源,我们关注固有宗教信仰的限定变量,并分析了固有宗教信仰,抑郁,生活满意度和内部适应性应对策略之间的推定关联。方法:我们参考了三家德国诊所治疗的111例患有抑郁和/或成瘾性疾病的患者的数据。在这项匿名的横断面研究中,使用了标准化的工具,例如5项量表依靠上帝的帮助(RGH),贝克抑郁抑郁量表(BDI),3项量表逃避疾病,简短的多维生活满意度量表( BMLSS)和内部适应性应对策略(通过AKU问卷进行衡量)。结果:成瘾性疾病患者的RGH明显高于抑郁症患者(F = 3.6; p = 0.03)。相关性分析显示,RGH与BDI评分没有显着相关,相反,抑郁症状与生活满意度和内部适应性应对策略(即重新评估:疾病有机会和有意识的生活)显着相关。 RGH低或高的患者的BDI评分无明显差异。 RGH的基本维度均与抑郁评分无关,但与生活满意度和(逃避疾病)满意度(负)相关。尽管如此,RGH高的患者具有明显更高的适应性应对策略。回归分析显示,重新评估作为一种认知应对策略,可以重新定义疾病的价值并将其作为发展机会(即,改变态度和行为),是患者RGH的最佳预测指标(Beta = 0.36,p = 0.001),而作为基础疾病的抑郁症(与成瘾性疾病相比)或患者的生活满意度均未对其RGH产生显着影响。结论:尽管成瘾性疾病患者的RGH明显高于抑郁症患者,但抑郁症状与患者的内在宗教信仰没有显着相关。特别是那些具有较高固有宗教信仰的患者似乎更容易获得积极的(内部)策略来应对,并获得更高的生活满意度。患者是否将灵性/宗教信仰用作可靠的资源,可能取决于他们在生活中的个人经历,他们的期望和特定的世界观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号